| Forums-> Main forum-> More indication of xbox 360 version of Withcer 2: |
| Author | Message |
| labwarrior Since 1876 Days |
2011-03-31 15:15:37 More indication of xbox 360 version of Withcer 2 More indication of xbox 360 version of Withcer 2 |
| IRAIPT0IR Since 1152 Days |
2011-03-31 15:25:04 Awesome. --- |
| Namaiwa Since 1942 Days |
2011-03-31 18:00:22 Well the game is a DX9.0 title so they will not have any problem porting it to the Xbox 360 with lower resolutions ...etc |
| labwarrior Since 1876 Days |
2011-03-31 18:06:38 In reply to Namaiwa (2011-03-31 18:00:22) Posted by Namaiwa Well the game is a DX9.0 title so they will not have any problem porting it to the Xbox 360 with lower resolutions ...etc But is ok, graphics are not everything and i am sure will at least look great |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 2444 Days |
2011-03-31 18:49:04 In reply to Namaiwa (2011-03-31 18:00:22) Posted by Namaiwa Well the game is a DX9.0 title so they will not have any problem porting it to the Xbox 360 with lower resolutions ...etc I mean, seriously.. if Crytek and DICE can do it I don't think anyone else has an excuse. |
| KORNdog Since 1848 Days |
2011-03-31 20:00:28 In reply to GriftGFX (2011-03-31 18:49:04) Posted by GriftGFX The Witcher 2 includes support for DX11 and is sporting some awesome tessellation--not that porting down to the Xbox would offer much of a challenge anyway. I mean, seriously.. if Crytek and DICE can do it I don't think anyone else has an excuse. |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 2444 Days |
2011-03-31 20:16:38 In reply to KORNdog (2011-03-31 20:00:28) Posted by KORNdog the expensive of framerate, resolution, AI, LOD and pop-in. |
| IRAIPT0IR Since 1152 Days |
2011-03-31 20:29:22 In reply to KORNdog (2011-03-31 20:00:28) Posted by KORNdog I'd hope they at least do a better job then crytech. by all means make the game look the best it can on consoles. but i hope they don't do it at the expensive of framerate, resolution, AI, LOD and pop-in. Talking about what Crytek did on Crysis 2. I don't see the point in playing in consoles if you care too much about that and ruins your experience, I honestly haven't found one single thing you listed there, maybe there were but I didn't noticed them, why? cause Im not searching with a microscope for them. Framerate is smooth too, I don't get those saying it gets unplayable and shit, even on intense fights where is multiple things on screen like smoke, particles flying everywhere, intense lighting casting doesn't drop framerate as far as I can tell, and its very smooth and playable. --- |
| labwarrior Since 1876 Days |
2011-03-31 20:29:43 Well, you cant do much with 5 years old hardware |
| snyma Since 416 Days |
2011-03-31 21:13:28 If you have a mid-range video card like the HD 5770 or 6850 you can run Crysis 2 with great performance and stable frame rates you will get 30-45fps at least same thing will happen with the witcher 2 |
| labwarrior Since 1876 Days |
2011-03-31 21:21:33 In reply to snyma (2011-03-31 21:13:28) Posted by snyma If you have a mid-range video card like the HD 5770 or 6850 you can run Crysis 2 with great performance and stable frame rates you will get 30-45fps at least same thing will happen with the witcher 2 Afterall Crysis 2 on 360 looking like that would have been impossible if the engine was not as optimized as it gets Same for Witcher 2 that uses streaming unlike Withcer 1 loading everything in ram |
| KORNdog Since 1848 Days |
2011-03-31 22:05:15 In reply to IRAIPT0IR (2011-03-31 20:29:22) Posted by IRAIPT0IR If it bothers you that much play on PC then. Talking about what Crytek did on Crysis 2. I don't see the point in playing in consoles if you care too much about that and ruins your experience, I honestly haven't found one single thing you listed there, maybe there were but I didn't noticed them, why? cause Im not searching with a microscope for them. Framerate is smooth too, I don't get those saying it gets unplayable and shit, even on intense fights where is multiple things on screen like smoke, particles flying everywhere, intense lighting casting doesn't drop framerate as far as I can tell, and its very smooth and playable. crytech have put visuals before things that actually MATTER. like performance, and AI, and quality control. it's great what they've achieved on consoles at first glance, i just wish they did it without sacrificing SO much. clearly you're fine with ignoring the problems, I'm not. |
| labwarrior Since 1876 Days |
2011-03-31 22:08:19 In reply to KORNdog (2011-03-31 22:05:15) Posted by KORNdog just because YOU can't see the blatant issues, doesn't mean they aren't there (and no, i dont need a microscope to see them, just my eyes). and yes, it's massively annoying to play with the problems the game has, some of which would go away on PC, others not (the ridiculously retarded AI) but to simply say "play it on PC" isn't exactly a good argument to take. i don't have a PC capable of playing it, i don't WANT a PC capable of playing it, and the GAME itself simply isn't good enough to want to upgrade my PC anyway. crytech have put visuals before things that actually MATTER. like performance, and AI, and quality control. it's great what they've achieved on consoles at first glance, i just wish they did it without sacrificing SO much. clearly you're fine with ignoring the problems, I'm not. Have you tried installing the game ? |
| scoobs0688 Since 1079 Days |
2011-03-31 22:11:40 This game would probably look like balls on consoles --- |
| IRAIPT0IR Since 1152 Days |
2011-03-31 22:41:28 In reply to KORNdog (2011-03-31 22:05:15) Posted by KORNdog just because YOU can't see the blatant issues, doesn't mean they aren't there (and no, i dont need a microscope to see them, just my eyes). and yes, it's massively annoying to play with the problems the game has, some of which would go away on PC, others not (the ridiculously retarded AI) but to simply say "play it on PC" isn't exactly a good argument to take. i don't have a PC capable of playing it, i don't WANT a PC capable of playing it, and the GAME itself simply isn't good enough to want to upgrade my PC anyway. crytech have put visuals before things that actually MATTER. like performance, and AI, and quality control. it's great what they've achieved on consoles at first glance, i just wish they did it without sacrificing SO much. clearly you're fine with ignoring the problems, I'm not. Because sure as hell I can notice shitty framerate and this game doesn't have shitty framerate at all, I tought it would be like LoS but that was not the case at all, smooth as hell on this end. I said and I stand by that, I had zero so called awfull frame drops with my 360 game installed(dont know if that makes a diference) I had zero tearing, I had not seen blatantly obvious as you call pop in, the AI in my game does what the AI in games are suposed to do, I had zero bugs. I guess Im lucky then, and as far as I can say Crytek did a fantastic job with console versions, Resolution aside because it indeed looks better than all games out there including PS3 exclusives IMO. --- |
| scoobs0688 Since 1079 Days |
2011-03-31 23:23:45 In reply to KORNdog (2011-03-31 22:05:15) Posted by KORNdog just because YOU can't see the blatant issues, doesn't mean they aren't there (and no, i dont need a microscope to see them, just my eyes). and yes, it's massively annoying to play with the problems the game has, some of which would go away on PC, others not (the ridiculously retarded AI) but to simply say "play it on PC" isn't exactly a good argument to take. i don't have a PC capable of playing it, i don't WANT a PC capable of playing it, and the GAME itself simply isn't good enough to want to upgrade my PC anyway. crytech have put visuals before things that actually MATTER. like performance, and AI, and quality control. it's great what they've achieved on consoles at first glance, i just wish they did it without sacrificing SO much. clearly you're fine with ignoring the problems, I'm not. --- |
| labwarrior Since 1876 Days |
2011-04-01 00:26:53 In reply to scoobs0688 (2011-03-31 22:11:40) Posted by scoobs0688 This game would probably look like balls on consoles |
| scoobs0688 Since 1079 Days |
2011-04-01 00:36:21 In reply to labwarrior (2011-04-01 00:26:53) Posted by labwarrior Probably not, considering how Crysis 2 looks --- |
| labwarrior Since 1876 Days |
2011-04-01 09:08:39 In reply to scoobs0688 (2011-04-01 00:36:21) Posted by scoobs0688 Witcher 2 was built for PC and would be ported down to consoles. Crysis 2 was built for consoles and ported to PC sadly, hence the 1/2 size textures of crysis 1. Big difference. Same case as Crysis 2 That is also why Withcer 2 areas seem a bit like coriddors, very linear and narrow most of the time as you will see in any in game pics/video |
| scoobs0688 Since 1079 Days |
2011-04-01 11:08:05 Something tells me the console ports will look like ass compared to what we've seen so far, speculation of course. I could be wrong tho --- |
| dcdelgado Since 2304 Days |
2011-04-01 14:59:01 The console port will look great, but i cant wait for that, so the pc version it is, so glad it has 360controller support out of he box!. --- |
| gow_fan Since 801 Days |
2011-04-02 01:06:37 It is too late may be next game or console version will be released next year. |
| Forums-> Main forum-> More indication of xbox 360 version of Withcer 2: |
You have to be logged in to post in this forum!
Log in
- 51 Crysis 3 new screenshots
- 16 Our videos of Max Payne 3
- 13 Hitman Absolution has done it again
- 12 The Amazing Spider-Man: Web Rush
- 32 Forza Horizon gets a screenshot
- 11 Darksiders II strikes again
- 43 Our videos of Diablo III

Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL