Loakum @Driftwood Awesome! I’m loving it! It does show a much crisper picture and the frame rate looks good! I was playing Stella Blade and Dragonball Soarkling Blast! :) (2 Weeks ago)
Driftwood @Loakum: enjoy, the one Sony sent us will be there on launch day. Coverage will follow asap. (2 Weeks ago)
Loakum *takes a large sip of victorious grape juice* ok….my PS5 pro arrived early! So much winning! :) (2 Weeks ago)
Driftwood @reneyvane: non ils l'ont publié le 1er octobre et je crois que tu l'avais déjà linkée. ;) (6 Weeks ago)
CraCra Y a un souci sur les forums ? (9 Weeks ago)
nostradamus very few with religious beliefs are naive or zealots, but for sure don't find amusing their beliefs being thrown in for clout. maybe STFU with that discourse? (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
The only unfair thing about practically everyone agreeing on a game being average is that the ones liking it are branded idiots - or at least might feel that way.
In my opinion, idiocy isn't about liking whatever you want, there's no shame in that at all. In fact, liking something that isn't generally considered fantastic is prolly just proof that you're not just a mindless zomibie buying "what ma-gazines tell you to buyyy" - to paraphrase that lovely chocobo song - nor caring too much about your "gamer cred", but suggesting that that many sources are collectively wrong when they put similarly lukewarm scores (or any other score) on a game absolutely independently of one another is bordering on arrogant.
Even more so when you haven't even played the damn game.
[img]crazyhippie.gif[/img]
On another note, GF has sent me this game, and Dynasty Warriors: Gundam. Time to do the Carlton Happy Dance
all about Crisis Core
"The only unfair thing about practically everyone agreeing on a game being average"
This is what I don't get... there are many more reviews stating its a good game rather than a bad or average one, but why is it that only the bad reviews are have any credibility around here or to someone like yourself? Are people that anxious to label it an average or bad game? See thats something I'll never understand. Also for people that don't like this sorta game who are they to call it an average game? Its an average game that they wouldn't care for regardless of what review score it got right?
I think a lot of people are sheep in a sense because everyone was univerally positive about what they were seeing of the game until a single bad review about it. Suddenly people are taking back statements and cosigning to what sites like 1up are saying. Sheep. When people on neogaf got the japanese version there were practically unanimous good impressions from what they played. Blim absolutely love it. So now.. despite what people who have played the game think the opinions of individuals (who are also human mind you) saying it sucks or isn't good supercede those of people that played and enjoyed it simply because they work for a game review site?
Sorry, but thats grade a bullshit :)
Kenshin you talk about conspiracy, but it seems people on here ready to label blue dragon as average or bad are just as willing to accept that there is some sort of conspiracy as to why Blue Dragon received a 9, 9, 9, 10 from Famitsu and was called a must have for rpg fans. The fact that you guys are ignoring every good review about it especially the gameinformer one just goes to show you guys seem to be of the belief that anyone that gives this game a good review isn't telling the truth or wrong so is that any different from when I say I don't believe sites giving it such bad reviews are wrong as well?
Yea talk about conspiracies! :)
If you guys reserve the right to ignore good reviews of the game and assume they are inaccurate in some way then I reserve my right to assume bad reviews about the game are also inaccurate in some way. There is a major difference between me and some of you blue dragon naysayers though. I've actually played the game quite a bit and am in a better position to say whether a review is wrong or right about the game.
Hironobu Sakaguchi is coming back to reclaim the throne :)
October 20th 2007 (A good day)
Don't ask any questions just shut up and buy Halo : Ghosts of the Onyx one of the greatest books ever.
pssh! more like electronic gay-ming monthly! amirite
Corrected that.
But nonetheless I'll now start playing my USA copy of the game I've supposedly never played before.
Hironobu Sakaguchi is coming back to reclaim the throne :)
October 20th 2007 (A good day)
Don't ask any questions just shut up and buy Halo : Ghosts of the Onyx one of the greatest books ever.
pssh! more like electronic gay-ming monthly! amirite
Sure, you can be the only guy who's "RIGHT" in a case like that, but with something like this it's really all about the perception of those people. Keep in mind they've played a bizillion games, which means they're jaded freaks the lot of them.
79% average on gamerankings tells a tale of a game that hasn't been as entusiastically embraced as one might've hoped. It's not a grand conspiracy, it's the voices of a ton of critics. I'm not saying anything about whether the game is good or bad or whether it's right or wrong to love it, but I am saying that it's incredibly unfair to dismiss that many collective scores as lies just because you do like it. Hell, 95% of all Wii games float around that score and I sincerely love half of them.
The same is true about the opposite.
But fine, if it makes you feel a lot better to discredit all those people and say that their opinions and conclusions are ALL wrong, then go right ahead. I'm not quite sure why I bother really.
EDIT: My point is that I DON'T presume to know better than the absolute majority of games review sites and I DON'T reserve the right to say that they're wrong to put Bioshock and Gears where they are. On the contrary I realise that I am in minority in not thinking it deserves that amount of wild praise, and I humbly express that opinion. Maybe I'm gullible in that sense, but I respect general opinion.
Paper skin backstory they are regular kids for goodness sake. They were just regular kids who were the victim of a terrible catastrophe that plagued their village constantly hurting innocent people and they finally decided to do something about it knowing how dangerous it could be.
Are they suppose to have a long history or reputation of being incredible warriors or something? Are they suppose to be proficient with deadly weapons or something?
They are definitely being unfair it's fairly obvious.
And I'm not saying this because I'm some ignorant FPS junkie who can't appreciate a good JRPG. I'm saying this because it isn't a good JRPG. So please, quit calling out every reviewer in the world because your game didn't deliver the goods. BD could have been a hell of a lot better than it is, and you know it.
And I'm not saying this because I'm some ignorant FPS junkie who can't appreciate a good JRPG. I'm saying this because it isn't a good JRPG. So please, quit calling out every reviewer in the world because your game didn't deliver the goods. BD could have been a hell of a lot better than it is, and you know it.
LOL you honestly don't know me very well then I assume. The game I first saw in action at TGS 2006 and the game I'm playing now exceeds my original expectations for it so forgive me, but you know squat about what I think should or could've been better because you don't know shit about me :) You have your tastes and I have mine live with it.
"It's got a boring story, dull characters, bland visuals, and an unsatisfying combat system."
lol this is funny coming from someone that doesn't know a thing about the game. How do you know all that exactly are you playing the game are you interested in it? When have you ever been interested? Weren't you just talking about bullshit? Yea you were so don't feed me that tired crap about you aren't just saying this because you're some ignorant FPS junkie who can't appreciate a good JRPG because you are exactly that. You think probably think "eww" just from looking at the characters and the designs I know many gamers like yourself believe me it doesn't surprise me.
So again you don't give a damn about the game and your telling me the game has a boring story, dull characters, bland visuals (LOL) and an unsatisfying combat system.
Haha look at you like the little puppet repeating all the same nonsense you heard reviewers say and accepting them as hard facts that will be true for everyone. If you had any sense whatsoever you wouldn't even go around spouting the "bland visuals" line since nobody needs to play the game to see that it has awesome visuals. You are trying too hard with that line freniger come with better stuff than that please? Make it interesting.
So listen up you ignorant fps junkie (thanks for giving me something to classify you with) The combat isn't unsatisfying because jrpg fans like myself love turnbased jrpgs its right up my alley you are talking to someone that STILL today plays final fantasy VII ultima edition and final fantasy VIII on his pc... you honestly think Blue Dragon's combat is a negative for me? Really?
The characters aren't boring because I love anime type shit like that. I watch animes and read mangas with this sorta crap every single day so you and the reviewers spouting that same nonsense can take those complaints and stick em where the sun don't shine. The same goes for the story. This is anime how many times must I tell you this stuff isn't boring to me I welcome it. Does Blue Dragon have anime cliches? Hell yea it does, but its anime cliches with still plenty enough mystery in there to draw my interest because I don't fully know what to expect or whats around every corner, but I have no shame in saying I welcome every last one of the anime cliches I love so much. I see cliches in a lot of things there are a ton in Gears of War, there even exist some in Mass Effect *gasp* there are even cliches in Assassin's Creed, Lost Planet I could go on and on.
You know what my ONLY legitimate complaints about Blue Dragon are? and how I think it could've been better? My first complain recently arrived after checking out anime and manga for Blue Dragon (which are entirely different, but the shadows have personality and are a character themselves)
#1 I wish the shadows themselves were characters that talked and were characters in themselves sorta like the anime or the ral grudo manga. I think the shadows having individual personalities to themselves was such a very slick way to do some even more incredible things with the story or the game's universe. Thats a path I hope they seriously look into exploring for a sequel.
#2 I would've liked to see them nail the performance down so it didn't dip at the times that it does, but it doesn't take away from the experience for me, but it still would've been nice if it were rock solid.
#3 Those awesome looking corporeal attacks (and this is by far my biggest complaint) I wish there were atleast 3 more of those per character or even 2 more at the least that would've been just fantastic as far as I'm concerned. They did an awesome job with whats there that it seems almost criminal that they didn't take advantage of that cool stuff they put in there by adding more to the game.
If I reviewed Blue Dragon would I give it a 10 or 9.8 or even a 9.5 or 9? I probably wouldn't. I'm definitely a fanboy of this game, but I admit its faults where I see them not based on what others tell me to think. Lowest I'd probably give it is an 83 or 82 and highest possibly 89. I'm not expecting monster reviews here, but I'm expecting fair ones. Reviews I see in the 5 or 6 range or even the 7.0-7.9 range I'll view as inaccurate got a problem with that?
Time to get use to it man I did the very same thing when Kingdom Hearts 2 was released. I saw IGN's review I said screw them I think they're wrong and I chose to agree with reviews that were more inline with my opinion and I loved KH2 easily one of my favorite ps2 titles and if you don't mind I'll be doing the exact same for Blue Dragon. Now I'll no longer waste my time arguing with you guys I've got an awesome jrpg to play.
Defense Force in full effect =P
Hironobu Sakaguchi is coming back to reclaim the throne :)
October 20th 2007 (A good day)
Don't ask any questions just shut up and buy Halo : Ghosts of the Onyx one of the greatest books ever.
pssh! more like electronic gay-ming monthly! amirite
I dont think it's a conspiracy or anything, let's not be silly here. my argument about FF12 is just an example that's all.
At the end of the day, why we're arguing about this is just about wishing success for a game that deserves to succeed. Hopefully, it wont disappear like Viva pinata or beyond good and evil did. such a shame really :(
Many of the reviews for Blue Dragon have been written like little fan boys trying to slate the game, how anyone can sit and read a review when they use the english skills of a 10 year old and then say they are being professional critical is bullshit.
Marumaro for the WIN !!
Marumaro for the WIN !!
Personally I hope LO does a bit better, it's more my thing.
I'm "having a go" at Optimus persistence in claiming that reviewers somehow deliberately set out to make the game look bad. Starting out with a mindset to trash it and "fend off its undeniable appeal!".
Plus as you say the Art style and look of the game may have added to this, I just don't get the logic of playing a JRPG and then complaining that the characters are generic or irratating when this is what JRPG's are known for.
It almost seems some of these reviews are written by haters of JRPGs. (so i can see where Optimus is coming from)
Anyway it really matters not, I liked the game and thats all that matters to me.
Marumaro for the WIN !!
Phaethon, the forum Spectre.
Plus as you say the Art style and look of the game may have added to this, I just don't get the logic of playing a JRPG and then complaining that the characters are generic or irratating when this is what JRPG's are known for.
It almost seems some of these reviews are written by haters of JRPGs. (so i can see where Optimus is coming from)
Anyway it really matters not, I liked the game and thats all that matters to me.
Marumaro for the WIN !!
I only ask because I don't get how someone could assume that the majority of reviews that don't favour a certain game are somehow all biased against the genre.
Could it not simply be that the game isn't that great and that the people that like it have wanted to like it since they first heard about it and what big names were attached to it? I dunno...that seems more likely than some asinine conspiracy.
The game is on the way of becoming the best jRPG I've ever played. up there with Dragon Quest 8 and Final Fantasy X :D
*SHOCK and DISBELIEF*
Phaethon, the forum Spectre.
GET OVER IT
mess with the best die the like rest