Destiny 2: Gameplay Trailer

Game2k
Thursday, May 18, 2017 | 8:27 PM
14 comments

Trailer PC PS4 Xbox One

Activision and Bungie unveiled the first gaemplay footage of Destiny 2 today and now that the livestream is over here is the gameplay trailer in high quality along with a bunch of screenshots. The game will be out on September 8 and regarding the PC version it will be exclusive to Battle.net, Blizzard's platform.
Update: more screenshots added.

Gear screenshots

Environments

PvP screenshots

Strike screenshots

Story screenshots

High quality stream and download

Gameplay Reveal Trailer

Sdarts

Commented on 2017-05-18 21:08:30

Thanks for the trailer and all the images in high quality.

In reply to

melodeon

Commented on 2017-05-18 21:23:02

Yes thanks for all your hard work, really appreciate it.

In reply to

This message and account have been deleted at the user's request

GunsnSwords

Commented on 2017-05-19 03:21:19

I...am surprised that the characters actually don't look better than Halo 5. this looks a whole lot like the first game. and almost half of the trailer is CG, not gameplay.

It seems Bungie has grown weary of making cutting edge games this past decade. I wonder why, this would have been the perfect title to best Halo 5 and Killzone... There is no denying Bungie's talented heritage of many years ago. shame.

In reply to

GriftGFX

Commented on 2017-05-19 03:27:16 In reply to GunsnSwords

Off-screen PC gameplay: https://youtu.be/NkQVTkulYGg

Looks pretty good from what I can see.

Posted by GunsnSwords

It seems Bungie has grown weary of making cutting edge games this past decade. I wonder why, this would have been the perfect title to best Halo 5 and Killzone... There is no denying Bungie's heritage of many years ago. shame.

Bungie... cutting edge? Because they made a bunch of slightly above average looking 30 fps Xbox games? Come on now...

In reply to

GunsnSwords

Commented on 2017-05-19 03:57:02 In reply to GriftGFX

Yes it's great that it's finally on pc and all, which is a big change actually for Bungie. and they're doing pc a great service with support and 60fps. I guess i didn't see it that way.

Posted by GriftGFX

Bungie... cutting edge? Because they made a bunch of slightly above average looking 30 fps Xbox games? Come on now...

I just mean from the technical bar they set with Halo 2. they set a really high bar there for themselves back then. RE4 was the only other game i thought could beat it.

Halo 3 had great physics but Halo 4 was inconceivable in Xbox 360's lifespan. It proved something was up with Bungie. the gap difference between Halo 3 and 4 was major, to this day.

In reply to

GriftGFX

Commented on 2017-05-19 04:19:12 In reply to GunsnSwords

Posted by GunsnSwords

60fps.

You're selling the platform short. 144hz g-sync or bust :D

I don't really agree with this stuff. I don't think bungie ever wowed me technically, and they had far less competition in the genre on consoles when Halo started. There were definitely other Xbox 1 and Xbox 360 games that look better than Halo. And wait... were you blown away by Halo 4's graphics? Why?

The leap between Reach and Halo 4.. not so grand. And personally I like the look of Reach more. It has more consistent art direction. I think 343 got significantly better at everything with Halo 5.

Their choice to target this spec (30 fps) is disappointing but I'm not surprised.

In reply to

[quote=GunsnSwords]60fps.[/quote]

You're selling the platform short. 144hz g-sync or bust  :D

[quote]I just mean from the technical bar they set with Halo 2. they set a really high bar there for themselves back then. RE4 was the only other game i thought could beat it.

Halo 3 had great physics but Halo 4 was inconceivable in Xbox 360's lifespan. It proved something was up with Bungie. the gap difference between Halo 3 and 4 was major, to this day.[/quote]

The leap between Reach and Halo 4.. not so grand. And personally I like the look of Reach more. It has more consistent art direction. I think 343 got significantly better at everything with Halo 5.

Their choice to target this spec (30 fps) is disappointing but I'm not surprised.

GunsnSwords

Commented on 2017-05-19 05:51:22 In reply to GriftGFX

Posted by GriftGFX

And wait... were you blown away by Halo 4's graphics? Why?

It used over 200 blendshapes (300 short of Ryse) for facial animation and it was all in game.
link
http://sortadone.artstation.com/projects/mOxQ8

Halo Reach did not use blenshapes but rather traditional bone joints found in many last gen titles. .....just curious to know which game on xbox 360 had better facial tech that wasn't already in Halo 4.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViAUxQ6h5Ek

In reply to

GunsnSwords

Commented on 2017-05-19 06:10:03

@ the random the link above is Destiny 2 running on PS4 pro. i forgot to type that it doesn't seem to be running at 60fps. which is odd. posting the link again below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViAUxQ6h5Ek

In reply to

Wheat_Thins

Commented on 2017-05-19 15:45:37

So can it even sustain 30 FPS on a original PS4 pro at 1080P or are they going to have to run it at some dynamic resolution.....

I will be purchasing for the PC if I can stomach the thought of death by DLC.

In reply to

KORNdog

Commented on 2017-05-19 16:47:24 In reply to Wheat_Thins

Posted by Wheat_Thins

why wouldn't it? basic PS4 version of destiny is 1080p 30fps Vsync'd. it's not like this looks much better graphically.

Posted by GunsnSwords

fucking hell, no mans sky much?

In reply to

GriftGFX

Commented on 2017-05-19 20:03:08 In reply to KORNdog

Posted by KORNdog

fucking hell, no mans sky much?

Wait.. are you talking about the UI? Because you've got this totally backwards. No Man's Sky copied Destiny's UI.

In reply to

GunsnSwords

Commented on 2017-05-19 21:53:10 In reply to GriftGFX

Posted by Wheat_Thins

probably 1440p @30 fps? or 1080p supper sampled. plain 1080p 30 fps would be a down right ripoff for ps4 pro.

Posted by GriftGFX

Wait.. are you talking about the UI? Because you've got this totally backwards. No Man's Sky copied Destiny's UI.

red grass and blue-greenish color filter comes to mind. same stuff in no man's sky.

In reply to

GunsnSwords

Commented on 2017-05-22 04:55:49

@ above it's been confirmed to be 4k for ps4 pro, so that pretty much answers why it's at 30 fps and with same old visuals.

In reply to

What's up?

Members
Announcements

Loakum @Driftwood Awesome! I’m loving it! It does show a much crisper picture and the frame rate looks good! I was playing Stella Blade and Dragonball Soarkling Blast! :) (4 Days ago)
Driftwood @Loakum: enjoy, the one Sony sent us will be there on launch day. Coverage will follow asap. (6 Days ago)
Loakum *takes a large sip of victorious grape juice* ok….my PS5 pro arrived early! So much winning! :) (6 Days ago)
Driftwood @reneyvane: non ils l'ont publié le 1er octobre et je crois que tu l'avais déjà linkée. ;) (4 Weeks ago)
reneyvane Factornews à joué à KingdomComeDeliverance2 au Gamescom 2024 mais ne publie sa preview que maintenant ? [url] (5 Weeks ago)
CraCra Y a un souci sur les forums ? (7 Weeks ago)
nostradamus very few with religious beliefs are naive or zealots, but for sure don't find amusing their beliefs being thrown in for clout. maybe STFU with that discourse? (10 Weeks ago)

Driftwood Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)