Gun: Xbox 360 video

Commented on 2005-11-12 15:46:09

well, I can't see any difference, so my money is staying firmly in my pocket.
They could have atleast put a thousand Bison on the screen at once.

In reply to

medafor

Commented on 2005-11-12 15:49:00

why did they let this game on the 360, when it could have just been for the xbox and backwards compatible? why microsoft why? i hope we do see this alot in the xbox360's future.

In reply to

Manager

Commented on 2005-11-12 16:02:32

UGH! I'm hit. UGH! I'm hit. UGH! I'm hit.

AH! AH!

Ragh! Ragh!

*Poff poff*

I am 100% sure that those 10 hours will easily make my head explode. They really need some more sounds samples for it.

In reply to

Slabs

Commented on 2005-11-12 16:26:33

*Poff poff* indeed! :)

In reply to

akirru

Commented on 2005-11-12 16:30:09 In reply to medafor

Posted by medafor

why did they let this game on the 360, when it could have just been for the xbox and backwards compatible? why microsoft why? i hope we do see this alot in the xbox360's future.

Probably because the game is going to look better on the xbox 360?? .. anyway its early gen and MS need all the games they can get for their platform.

In reply to

Dukemaster

Commented on 2005-11-12 16:39:53

This game really sucks... it's as simple as that. I've got the PC version and even with everything at max the game looks like crap, it's just terrible. I would say that it even looks bad for a PS2 game. And don't buy it for the gameplay, that's even worse. All you do is shoot a little wih your gun and that's it. They try to get a little variation in there by putting you in a cannon on a ship and let you race with a horse. And those parts are even worse and more boring then the normal gunfights. Last and definitely least is the story line, that's as lame as it gets. This game looks and feels like a 5 year old game, probably even older. It's like playing a very VERY old game with the resolution turned up. Really this game simply sucks, and i would highly recommened this site to dump it and not post any movies or screens anymore. Really this game is THAT bad...

In reply to

4_U

Commented on 2005-11-12 17:16:45

Ok, the game really suck becuse the graphic isn't up to date? That's a really stupid comment.

In reply to

SpL

Commented on 2005-11-12 17:26:07

This game doesn't have the Graphics but it may have Gameplay.
So IMHO i really don't care if even PGR3 looked like Gran Turismo 1 on the PS.
I would still buy it cuz i like its GAMEPLAY.
Most gaming sites have given the Xbox GUN version a 8 out of the 10.
This game only looks so terrible if you compare it to better looking games on the Xbox 360.
But thats not the way to look at games well thats how i see it.
I wont compare pong on the SNES with Super Mario World.

In reply to

peoples

Commented on 2005-11-12 17:46:38

what did I say :l It is not all about the graphics

In reply to

Dukemaster

Commented on 2005-11-12 17:56:08

I don't now why sites are giving the game pretty good marks in the 8 to 10 range.I played the game and it SUCKS. And not jus the graphics, the gameplay is almost just as bad. The idea of a big world to roam freely in sounds great, but in this game it just worked out properly. The whole world is pretty lifeless as well, and i could probably keep going and going on how bad this game is. Mayby if the game was released a few years ago(at least before GTA 3 when the ''free world in where to roam about was something special) it might have been fun but now it isn't. The thing is that there are so many games out there right now that are way more fun then Gun that i don't see how sites can give this game in the 8-10 mark range. It should be 6-7 at best, simply because there are games that are way beter then this one, and if you give this game a 8 and other great games like FEAR or King Kong a 9, that difference o 1 point isn't the difference in aktual gamequality.

In reply to

akirru

Commented on 2005-11-12 18:27:53

the game is NOOOOOOOO! where near as bad as Dukemaster states it is tbh. Obviously its not your type of game dude. Anyways there is more to games than graphics (i still play CS 1.6 ... lol).

Although you are entitled to your own opinion of course.

In reply to

easynow

Commented on 2005-11-12 18:34:07 In reply to SpL

Posted by SpL

This game doesn't have the Graphics but it may have Gameplay.
So IMHO i really don't care if even PGR3 looked like Gran Turismo 1 on the PS.
I would still buy it cuz i like its GAMEPLAY.

dont think you would somehow.

if that was true why are you getting an xbox 360 ???
save your pennies and go buy a playstation and gt1 if all your bothered about is gameplay.

yea gameplay does matter , but those who say gfx doesnt matter are stupid or liers

come on this is the start of the next gen and some companys are cashing in on that and just porting over xb1 games with just enhanced textures. its us gamers that have to shell out our hard earned cash. they could have tried a bit harderlook at COD2 they made the 360 version look better than the pc version

in my opinion the games that are worth getting at launch are

COD2
PGR3
CONDEMNED
KAMEO
and PDZ

In reply to

fohammer

Commented on 2005-11-12 18:57:37 In reply to roxwell

Posted by roxwell

well, I can't see any difference, so my money is staying firmly in my pocket.
They could have atleast put a thousand Bison on the screen at once.

What ever you are smoking please let me have some. This game looks better than the xbox version. It's a big improvement, not GOW but an improvement.

In reply to

Kip

Commented on 2005-11-12 19:52:12

I "Agree" with Duke.
It is a horrible outdated game.
Thats boring. It's the same old same old but with a western feel.
Whoopie Do!

Plays and looks terrible...
(PC VERSION)

In reply to

Dukemaster

Commented on 2005-11-12 20:28:57 In reply to Dukemaster

A few shots from the PC version. And yes this is with everything at maximum, 1600x1200 resolution and 4xaa:

As you can see this game looks very outdated, the graphics are just so bad that those alone pretty much make the game boring. The gameplay is like Kip said same old and ''been there done that''. By the way: Since the Xbox 360 version clearly has the Full-scene Effects option on(witch i only hade in the first screenshot, it makes everything a bit blurry) it probably won't have any AA. Because when i activate that option, it automatically blocks the option to use AA. So on the sharpness department, the Xbox 360 will probably have more jaggies etc. then what you can see in my screenshots.

Edit: Ignore the red part on the left site of those screens, that's part of another screenshot wich paint somehow mixed with the other one. Sorry about that.

In reply to

A few shots from the PC version. And yes this is with everything at maximum, 1600x1200 resolution and 4xaa:

[URL=http://img36.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gun15bi.jpg][IMG]http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/561/gun15bi.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://img36.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gun23vt.jpg][IMG]http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/849/gun23vt.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://img36.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gun37hh.jpg][IMG]http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/6646/gun37hh.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://img289.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gun57vt.jpg][IMG]http://img289.imageshack.us/img289/6130/gun57vt.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

As you can see this game looks very outdated, the graphics are just so bad that those alone pretty much make the game boring. The gameplay is like Kip said same old and ''been there done that''. By the way: Since the Xbox 360 version clearly has the Full-scene Effects option on(witch i only hade in the first screenshot, it makes everything a bit blurry) it probably won't have any AA. Because when i activate that option, it automatically blocks the option to use AA. So on the sharpness department, the Xbox 360 will probably have more jaggies etc. then what you can see in my screenshots.

Edit: Ignore the red part on the left site of those screens, that's part of another screenshot wich paint somehow mixed with the other one. Sorry about that.

QuezcatoL

Commented on 2005-11-12 20:59:24

Just finished the whole game was 8/10 not more no less,but very short.

In reply to

Slabs

Commented on 2005-11-12 21:03:46

Full-Screen Effects INCLUDES AA.

In reply to

amerakindesi

Commented on 2005-11-12 22:06:44 In reply to SpL

Posted by SpL

This game doesn't have the Graphics but it may have Gameplay.
So IMHO i really don't care if even PGR3 looked like Gran Turismo 1 on the PS.
I would still buy it cuz i like its GAMEPLAY.
Most gaming sites have given the Xbox GUN version a 8 out of the 10.
This game only looks so terrible if you compare it to better looking games on the Xbox 360.
But thats not the way to look at games well thats how i see it.
I wont compare pong on the SNES with Super Mario World.

Gamespot gave it a 7.4 out of 10
TeamXbox gave it a 7.8 out of 10
Eurogamer gave it a 7 out of 10
*EDIT* Actually don't count these scores...people are messed up and seem to like this game...

In reply to

roxwell

Commented on 2005-11-12 22:25:18 In reply to fohammer

What ever you are smoking please let me have some. This game looks better than the xbox version. It's a big improvement, not GOW but an improvement.

Not enough for me to shell out the xtra cash it aint!
BUt you go right ahead.

In reply to

thextreme1

Commented on 2005-11-13 00:25:38

Watching someone riding around in circles for 5 minutes hasnt changed my mind. I would like to see someone actually taking off across the countyside. The graphics do look better, but I am still not convinced.

In reply to

QuezcatoL

Commented on 2005-11-13 01:09:38

Its avg score is 83-90 from all sites and papers,and on all formats.
But i finsihed the game+ all sidequest in 8 hours...this is a very short game people

In reply to

Critx

Commented on 2005-11-13 05:25:02

Who cares about the graphics...the gameplay looks very fun. It seems like most people these days all they care about is graphics. GRAPHICS GRAPHICS GRAPHICS!!!! Who the hell cares...as long as the game is FUN.

As QuezcatoL stated though, the game is about 8-10 hours long...which probably should mean the game should only be about $20-$30, not $50 or $60!! Thats insanity...I plan on waiting until it drops down to $30 before I purchase it.

And for all the people who are unsure about getting the game, why don't you just rent it? Who knows, you may like it...

In reply to

amerakindesi

Commented on 2005-11-13 05:51:34 In reply to Critx

Posted by Critx

Who cares about the graphics...the gameplay looks very fun. It seems like most people these days all they care about is graphics. GRAPHICS GRAPHICS GRAPHICS!!!! Who the hell cares...as long as the game is FUN.

As QuezcatoL stated though, the game is about 8-10 hours long...which probably should mean the game should only be about $20-$30, not $50 or $60!! Thats insanity...I plan on waiting until it drops down to $30 before I purchase it.

And for all the people who are unsure about getting the game, why don't you just rent it? Who knows, you may like it...

Posted by thextreme1

Watching someone riding around in circles for 5 minutes hasnt changed my mind. I would like to see someone actually taking off across the countyside. The graphics do look better, but I am still not convinced.

There's no complain about graphics there. Read before you make comments Critix! I actually agree, who would buy this over the top 4 games available for xbox 360 launch?
P.S. If you don't know what they are, then please take some time to review articule posts instead of complaining.

In reply to

[quote=Critx]Who cares about the graphics...the gameplay looks very fun. It seems like most people these days all they care about is graphics. GRAPHICS GRAPHICS GRAPHICS!!!! Who the hell cares...as long as the game is FUN.

As QuezcatoL stated though, the game is about 8-10 hours long...which probably should mean the game should only be about $20-$30, not $50 or $60!! Thats insanity...I plan on waiting until it drops down to $30 before I purchase it.

And for all the people who are unsure about getting the game, why don't you just rent it? Who knows, you may like it...[/quote]

[quote=thextreme1]Watching someone riding around in circles for 5 minutes hasnt changed my mind. I would like to see someone actually taking off across the countyside. The graphics do look better, but I am still not convinced.[/quote]

There's no complain about graphics there. Read before you make comments Critix! I actually agree, who would buy this over the top 4 games available for xbox 360 launch?
P.S. If you don't know what they are, then please take some time to review articule posts instead of complaining.

GibsonTX

Commented on 2005-11-13 07:43:50

The graphics really aren't THAT bad. I mean, compare the 360 version to the Xbox one, the 360's environments look much better, and more high-res. There's anti-aliasing, and it still looks pretty good for basically a port of an xbox game. The storyline sounds great, and the gameplay looks good, so I don't see what the problem is.

In reply to

Eddy186

Commented on 2005-11-13 08:14:52

Hmmmmm............ that game looks like my arse, which if you think the game is pretty then my arse is pretty if not then you get the idea. In gamemakers in g4 they showed the making a game and one of the developers said they used all the 360's power they could on this game. What a bunch of crap, just for that and the $10 more price tag for the 360 i will never in my life buy a game from neversoft or whatever there development company is called. Oh yeah they are the same cheap bstrds making another crappy port for the 360, what is it called, i think its tony hawk 4 or some crap like that. Yes, i love to express my opinion.

In reply to

Gun: Xbox 360 video

Video gallery

MGS05: Gameplay

MGS05: Gameplay

All comments (28)

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver 1-2 Remastered

Assassin's Creed Shadows

The First 43 Minutes of Loco Motive

Our Switch video of Ys X: Nordics

The Callisto Protocol is now PS5 Pro Enhanced