Survival trailer for I Am Alive

Commented on 2012-02-07 19:55:40

looking good. well, no the color looks like crap, the visuals in motion are really decent and way better than the last screens released made me think. i'll take it in consideration as a deal of the week.

In reply to

KORNdog

Commented on 2012-02-07 20:04:09

Looks shite, always has done, always will do. Yet another ubisoft title that has failed to achieve what it set out to do. It can sit alongside SC: conviction, far cry 2, POP08, ghost recon future soldier and assassins creed as games that never should have seen the light of day. Imo of course *patronising smiley face*

In reply to

digi_matrix

Commented on 2012-02-07 20:32:14

I want this game to be good, I really do. There is hardly any true survival games out there, there was that Japanese island survival game which wasn't so great, and then Stalker/Far Cry 2. I hope the new Tomb Raider is more in this direction.

In reply to

nostradamus

Commented on 2012-02-07 20:46:28 In reply to digi_matrix

Posted by digi_matrix

I want this game to be good, I really do. There is hardly any true survival games out there, there was that Japanese island survival game which wasn't so great, and then Stalker/Far Cry 2. I hope the new Tomb Raider is more in this direction.

this.

Even this game reeks os ilusion of choice, but is linear in form... i laugh when that corridorfest of Last of Us finallyn launches... a survival game by naughty "cutscene is gameplay" dog.

In reply to

KORNdog

Commented on 2012-02-07 21:13:59 In reply to nostradamus

Posted by nostradamus

this.

Even this game reeks os ilusion of choice, but is linear in form... i laugh when that corridorfest of Last of Us finallyn launches... a survival game by naughty "cutscene is gameplay" dog.

Awwww, bless his cotton socks, he tries SO hard...haha.

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2012-02-08 08:42:35 In reply to nostradamus

Posted by nostradamus

this.

Even this game reeks os ilusion of choice, but is linear in form... i laugh when that corridorfest of Last of Us finallyn launches... a survival game by naughty "cutscene is gameplay" dog.

seriously dude, try a little harder.

you call yourself Nostradamus and true to form your predictions are utter arse.

In reply to

Zat

Commented on 2012-02-08 08:59:45 In reply to KORNdog

Posted by KORNdog

Looks shite, always has done, always will do. Yet another ubisoft title that has failed to achieve what it set out to do. It can sit alongside SC: conviction, far cry 2, POP08, ghost recon future soldier and assassins creed as games that never should have seen the light of day. Imo of course *patronising smiley face*

When I see Your list of unsuccessful games.....hmmm...damn, You are demanding player.

Im sure I will try this and I think I will like it. Maybe the mechanics will by so bad, I will quit, but still, at least I will try it.

In reply to

Zat

Commented on 2012-02-08 09:08:19

OK...one thing I dont like about this game already.....why the hell he always must say "Im alive" in the end of every trailer. It would by more stylish to just let the name appear.

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2012-02-08 09:25:04 In reply to Zat

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Posted by Zat

When I see Your list of unsuccessful games.....hmmm...damn, You are demanding player.

lol :D

digi_matrix

Commented on 2012-02-08 15:11:40 In reply to Zat

Posted by Zat

OK...one thing I dont like about this game already.....why the hell he always must say "Im alive" in the end of every trailer. It would by more stylish to just let the name appear.

He needs to update you every time in these "video diaries" that he's definitely not dead. Or maybe it's a note for the blind gamers out there?

In reply to

blmbox

Commented on 2012-02-08 17:55:16 In reply to Zat

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Posted by Zat

When I see Your list of unsuccessful games.....hmmm...damn, You are demanding player.

Oh, it's cos they're not PS3 exclusives.

:D

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2012-02-08 21:27:01

SC: conviction, far cry 2, POP08, ghost recon future soldier i am with Korn there there shit, except pop08...

In reply to

GeRaLTo

Commented on 2012-02-09 07:56:49 In reply to blmbox

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Posted by blmbox

Oh, it's cos they're not PS3 exclusives.

:D

briliant ownage lol

Zat

Commented on 2012-02-09 08:04:48

SC: Conviction, yes. As a sequel to previous SC games, it wasnt SC. But still I enjoyed playing it. I dont agree with Far Cry 2. It was an awesome game. I think that only Run&Gun players didnt like it. No offense. But I loved playing in the jungle. With fire of course. About new Ghost Recon, cant accept the negative feedback, when noone played it yet. Yes...it looks like some HD remake of PS2 game and the graphics itself is somehow....cartoonish. But be honest.....this all is only about first "trailer impression" and mostly refers to graphics. If we are talking only about console versions of GR. Gameplay on PC was totally different story.

In reply to

KORNdog

Commented on 2012-02-09 10:20:28 In reply to Zat

Posted by Zat

SC: Conviction, yes. As a sequel to previous SC games, it wasnt SC. But still I enjoyed playing it. I dont agree with Far Cry 2. It was an awesome game. I think that only Run&Gun players didnt like it. No offense. But I loved playing in the jungle. With fire of course. About new Ghost Recon, cant accept the negative feedback, when noone played it yet. Yes...it looks like some HD remake of PS2 game and the graphics itself is somehow....cartoonish. But be honest.....this all is only about first "trailer impression" and mostly refers to graphics. If we are talking only about console versions of GR. Gameplay on PC was totally different story.

wouldnt you have prefared far cry 2 to play like, oh, i don't know... far cry? but it didnt, crysis played more like far cry, far cry 2 was just monotonus, repetative BS. imo of course. all ubisoft have done this gen with the exception of about...1 game, is ruin franchises (far cry, pop, ghost recon, splinter cell) and milk franchises that never deserved it in the first place (AC) i used to LOVE ubisoft. last gen they made some KILLER games. today however all they seem to do is develop shite.

In reply to

[quote=Zat]SC: Conviction, yes. As a sequel to previous SC games, it wasnt SC. But still I enjoyed playing it. I dont agree with Far Cry 2. It was an awesome game. I think that only Run&Gun players didnt like it. No offense. But I loved playing in the jungle. :-) With fire of course. About new Ghost Recon, cant accept the negative feedback, when noone played it yet. Yes...it looks like some HD remake of PS2 game and the graphics itself is somehow....cartoonish. But be honest.....this all is only about first "trailer impression" and mostly refers to graphics. If we are talking only about console versions of GR. Gameplay on PC was totally different story. :-)[/quote]

wouldnt you have prefared far cry 2 to play like, oh, i don't know... far cry? but it didnt, crysis played more like far cry, far cry 2 was just monotonus, repetative BS. imo of course. all ubisoft have done this gen with the exception of about...1 game, is ruin franchises (far cry, pop, ghost recon, splinter cell) and milk franchises that never deserved it in the first place (AC) i used to LOVE ubisoft. last gen they made some KILLER games. today however all they seem to do is develop shite.

PlumbDrumb

Commented on 2012-02-09 10:28:14 In reply to KORNdog

Posted by KORNdog

wouldnt you have prefared far cry 2 to play like, oh, i don't know... far cry?

No

Posted by KORNdog

but it didnt, crysis played more like far cry, far cry 2 was just monotonus, repetative BS.

Welcome to video games, and no, it didn't. And you're wrong, and dumb, and I could go on but I'd start to sound monotonous and repetitive.

Posted by KORNdog

imo of course.

Oh, well, then. End of discussion.

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2012-02-09 11:12:58 In reply to Zat

Posted by Zat

SC: Conviction, yes. As a sequel to previous SC games, it wasnt SC. But still I enjoyed playing it

I did not. SP was utter shit for a SC game (it was 24 the game)
MP....yeah....

Posted by Zat

About new Ghost Recon, cant accept the negative feedback, when noone played it yet. Yes...it looks like some HD remake of PS2 game and the graphics itself is somehow....cartoonish. But be honest.....this all is only about first "trailer impression" and mostly refers to graphics. If we are talking only about console versions of GR. Gameplay on PC was totally different story.

i am going by lets say A the trailer and B previous games (ghost recon 2, advance warfighter 1 and 2).. that's enough to tell me what is obvious, that its shit.
original gameplay of ghost recon and GRIT was the same on xbox as it was on pc.. i think your thinking of R6.. which is a other game they have looked like they have fucked over.

saying the graphics look like a HD ps2 game alone is enough to make your opinion questionable..

The original ghost recon was team based shooter, you had to work as a team to survive MP.. if you went solo, you was doomed to failure as with ALL games that required skill the dev/pub made it easier to pick up and play for more sales but in the process destroying the very soul of there games..

as for the ps2 comment though, ironically ghost recon on the PS2 was actually better than all current gen versions of the franchise.

as for farcry 2 sorry, not played that did not see it in list so cant comment.

In reply to

[quote=Zat]SC: Conviction, yes. As a sequel to previous SC games, it wasnt SC. But still I enjoyed playing it[/quote]

I did not. SP was utter shit for a SC game (it was 24 the game)
MP....yeah....

[quote=Zat]About new Ghost Recon, cant accept the negative feedback, when noone played it yet. Yes...it looks like some HD remake of PS2 game and the graphics itself is somehow....cartoonish. But be honest.....this all is only about first "trailer impression" and mostly refers to graphics. If we are talking only about console versions of GR. Gameplay on PC was totally different story. :-)[/quote]

i am going by lets say A the trailer and B previous games (ghost recon 2, advance warfighter 1 and 2).. that's enough to tell me what is obvious, that its shit.
original gameplay of ghost recon and GRIT was the same on xbox as it was on pc.. i think your thinking of R6.. which is a other game they have looked like they have fucked over.

saying the graphics look like a HD ps2 game alone is enough to make your opinion questionable..

The original ghost recon was team based shooter, you had to work as a team to survive MP.. if you went solo, you was doomed to failure as with ALL games that required skill the dev/pub made it easier to pick up and play for more sales but in the process destroying the very soul of there games..

as for the ps2 comment though, ironically ghost recon on the PS2 was actually better than all current gen versions of the franchise.

as for farcry 2 sorry, not played that did not see it in list so cant comment.

KORNdog

Commented on 2012-02-09 12:38:05 In reply to PlumbDrumb

Posted by PlumbDrumb

Oh, well, then. End of discussion.

what else whould anything people say on a forum be exactly? facts? lol. i'm starting to think i need a fucking disclaimer at the end of each and every post. would that make people feel better? probably not. meh

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2012-02-09 14:07:03 In reply to KORNdog

Posted by KORNdog

what else whould anything people say on a forum be exactly? facts? lol. i'm starting to think i need a fucking disclaimer at the end of each and every post. would that make people feel better? probably not. meh

i had one of those when i first came on the site.. grift did not like it though :(

Aww i miss that sig, can any mods access it? cause i cant rem it :(

In reply to

Zat

Commented on 2012-02-09 14:21:09

Well Im too lazy to reply to all comments. I said what I said, not going to change the opinion, but still I understand how these games can be viewed by other players. I play games from early 80s, so in fact, all today games look great. :-D
About that ghost recon, I forgot to mention, I was refering to GR Advanced Warfighter or how was it called. The previous GR games cant be compared, I agree.

In short.......hardcore tactical shooters or stealth games are "evolving" into simple shooters with a lot of "cool" slow-mo cuscenes and short and easy gameplay.

Developers aim is more and more focused on bigger and bigger range of players. The best example are simulations. Its getting a little better every year but a few years back it looked like the sims will by disappear for good.
I dont like it, but I cant say the game is bad, just because its easier and simplier.

In th end its just a game. Still the same formula - try it - like it - buy it (dont like it - no buy).

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2012-02-09 14:23:43

yeah... i cant argue with that ;)

In reply to

moroboshi

Commented on 2012-02-09 14:39:33

It's not graphically wonderful but I still hold out hope this will be a nice little game. I always liked the idea of the Zettai Zetsumei Toshi PS2 games but they were always so clunky as to be a chore to play.

Something's got to be good this year as looking at what's coming I see little but an endless line of FPSs, and I'm *very* bored of FPSs.

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2012-02-09 15:57:36

Halo 4 is all i am interested in fps this year and next.

In reply to

PlumbDrumb

Commented on 2012-02-09 16:52:48 In reply to KORNdog

Posted by KORNdog

what else whould anything people say on a forum be exactly? facts? lol. i'm starting to think i need a fucking disclaimer at the end of each and every post. would that make people feel better? probably not. meh

No, no. :D
I just vehemently disagree with people who think FarCry 2 sucks.

In reply to