Images of PES 2008

thedudex06

Commented on 2007-09-09 18:24:35

bring chelsea kit back

i dnt get how they always lose teams and gain some...

In reply to

Se777eN

Commented on 2007-09-09 18:28:08

Chel$ki who??

Looking good am interested to see how fifa 08 gets on..

In reply to

blmbox

Commented on 2007-09-09 18:43:04

Yeah, bring back Chelsea as a licensed team!

This game is going to walk all over Fifa in quality.

In reply to

LEBATO

Commented on 2007-09-09 19:02:45

It looks really awful, like they don't even remotely care to make any substantial improvements. Not buying this crap, not for $60.

Let's not forget that the biggest excuse for raising the price for next gen games was that graphics artists were a huge demand, and graphics this, graphics that.........all this just doesn't apply to this game at all. They finally got rid of the cardboard crowd, I can't see much else besides that. Player likeness is just awful too. So where exactly is this money going since they obviously aren't using it for licenses? (they lose them)

I mean, the difference is obvious to last gen, but I don't see my extra $10.

In reply to

benni

Commented on 2007-09-09 19:22:33

these are PC screenshots.

source: www.winningelevenblog.com

In reply to

Slique

Commented on 2007-09-09 19:25:00

LEBATO, Pro Evo is about gameplay, not graphics. If you want everything to look shiny, go buy FIFA. Oh, and the reason they can't have every Premiership team licensed is because of EA. They own those rights, and they refuse to give it up.

I'm so glad Tottenham are licensed. :D

In reply to

LEBATO

Commented on 2007-09-09 19:47:51 In reply to Slique

Posted by Slique

LEBATO, Pro Evo is about gameplay, not graphics.

I understand that, it's too you can't understand what my post is about.

In reply to

Slique

Commented on 2007-09-09 20:10:59

And it's too that you don't understand the costs of games development. You want to know where the money goes? It goes on making the game, marketing the game and maintaining it after release. It's not rocket science, really.

In reply to

acm2000

Commented on 2007-09-09 20:11:26

PES has always been ugly, and always will be, and personally i dont especially care about lack of licenses, if i did, id buy fifa, but id rather not thanks lol

In reply to

Superfrog

Commented on 2007-09-09 20:13:20

Parts of the screens look "blurry" because the game uses depth of field during replays.

In reply to

LEBATO

Commented on 2007-09-09 21:19:47 In reply to Slique

Posted by Slique

And it's too that you don't understand the costs of games development. You want to know where the money goes? It goes on making the game, marketing the game and maintaining it after release. It's not rocket science, really.

Holly shit! I didn't know that........all this time trying to understand when a genius like you could explain it so easily. It all makes sense now. My post is now irrelevant, because it all just makes sense.

Your incredible posts that had NOTHING to do with my post somehow were able to make me see the light. Thanks.

In reply to

Gamer13

Commented on 2007-09-09 21:24:54

This will be killer fooball at its best, nice images.

In reply to

mt_sabao

Commented on 2007-09-09 21:27:04 In reply to Superfrog

Posted by Slique

And it's too that you don't understand the costs of games development. You want to know where the money goes? It goes on making the game, marketing the game and maintaining it after release. It's not rocket science, really.

Yeah, i'm soo with Lebato on this.
Look, (i wrote this already) i cannot count the number of hours i've spent playing PES 3, 4, 5 on the PC. And although i could have easily played a cracked copy of this, i've always bought the originals because the game just rocked.
But you see, slowly i started getting the impression that year after year i was getting less and less for my money.

And yeah Slique, games are very expensive to develop nowadays we all know that, thanks for pointing that out. But LEBATO's point, and mine as well, is that these guys are being lazy, always throwing us with this PR crap, about new this and new that, but then when you have the new dvd spinning on your console it's the same old crap. A few more animations, new kits, change players and that's that. And they charge us the same as EPIC charge us for GEARS e.g., a TRULY next-gen.

Posted by Superfrog

Parts of the screens look "blurry" because the game uses depth of field during replays.

Yeah *roll eyes* now that's a next-gen graphical feature...

In reply to

[quote=Slique]And it's too that you don't understand the costs of games development. You want to know where the money goes? It goes on making the game, marketing the game and maintaining it after release. It's not rocket science, really.[/quote]

Yeah, i'm soo with Lebato on this.
Look,  (i wrote this already) i cannot count the number of hours i've spent playing PES 3, 4, 5 on the PC. And although i could have easily played a cracked copy of this, i've always bought the originals because the game just rocked.
But you see, slowly i started getting the impression that year after year i was getting less and less for my money.

And yeah Slique, games are very expensive to develop nowadays we all know that, thanks for pointing that out. But LEBATO's point, and mine as well, is that these guys are being lazy, always throwing us with this PR crap, about new this and new that, but then when you have the new dvd spinning on your console it's the same old crap. A few more animations, new kits, change players and that's that. And they charge us the same as EPIC charge us for GEARS e.g., a TRULY next-gen.

[quote=Superfrog]Parts of the screens look "blurry" because the game uses depth of field during replays.[/quote]
Yeah *roll eyes* now that's a next-gen graphical feature...

LEBATO

Commented on 2007-09-09 22:00:19

PES 2007
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2007/031/9307...

PES 2008
http://images.gamersyde.com/gallery/public/6256/12...

Can anyone please tell me exactly why we are paying $60 for this?

In reply to

Drunkenshaolin

Commented on 2007-09-09 22:43:27 In reply to LEBATO

Posted by LEBATO

PES 2007
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2007/031/9307...

PES 2008
http://images.gamersyde.com/gallery/public/6256/12...

Can anyone please tell me exactly why we are paying $60 for this?

it has a nice blue ball in 2008 thats why

In reply to

zerolight

Commented on 2007-09-09 22:45:18

Lebato, I don't recall PES 6 looking anything like the above in the flesh on the 360, and to be honest, I highly doubt PES 2008 will look as good as the screenshots either. Konami always release screens from the rendered intro movie rather than in game. I don't really care, as long as it plays well. Still undecided whether the PS3 or 360 version will get my cash though.

In reply to

slugboss

Commented on 2007-09-10 08:20:43

Is it normal for LEBATO to have "IS WRONG" next to the name... I just got here. I think you should buy super mario strikers or even megaman soccer if it doesn't make a difference. I'm not much a soccer fan, or a fan of games without explosives though..

In reply to

Inflatable

Commented on 2007-09-10 10:18:53 In reply to LEBATO

Posted by LEBATO

Can anyone please tell me exactly why we are paying $60 for this?

Why are PC games cheaper? There's no scaling or compatibility-issues on single-configuration consoles, so why are consoleversions of the same game always more expensive? And why are all games on a platform bassicly the same price when I'm pretty sure the differences in productioncosts are very big?

It's all just marketing.. It's a Xbox 360/PS3 game, so it's $60 by standard..

In reply to

deftangel

Commented on 2007-09-10 14:20:11

Console games are more expensive because the publishers (in this case, Konami) have to pay a royalty to the platform holder to publish on the platform. On the PC this doesn't exist, it's an open platform.

A colleague of mine said PES08 looked much better than last year's version when he saw it at Leipzig. To my eye there is an improvement, not stellar but it's there. 95% of the time you will be playing this from a long camera angle, the graphics are more than acceptable from that perspective.

Annual revisions of sports franchises are nothing new. In totality, the developers probably get 6-8 months of development time for each version. You're not going to get much more than either incremental improvements or stupid features that don't work. I'd rather take the refined gameplay of PES and incremental improvements year on year over FIFA.

But this situation isn't new people, it's been going on for years with Madden, FIFA etc.

In reply to

FireWire

Commented on 2007-09-10 14:25:56 In reply to slugboss

Posted by slugboss

Is it normal for LEBATO to have "IS WRONG" next to the name... I just got here.

That's a subtle joke inserted by the owner of this site :)

In reply to

valioso

Commented on 2007-09-10 15:28:49

For all saying they are interested in how fifa will look, the demo is supposed to hit psn and marketplace on the 13th..

In reply to

macphisto80

Commented on 2007-09-10 22:45:05 In reply to LEBATO

Posted by LEBATO

It looks really awful, like they don't even remotely care to make any substantial improvements. Not buying this crap, not for $60.

Let's not forget that the biggest excuse for raising the price for next gen games was that graphics artists were a huge demand, and graphics this, graphics that.........all this just doesn't apply to this game at all. They finally got rid of the cardboard crowd, I can't see much else besides that. Player likeness is just awful too. So where exactly is this money going since they obviously aren't using it for licenses? (they lose them)

I mean, the difference is obvious to last gen, but I don't see my extra $10.

Player likeness is awful? I looked at image two and didn't know it was Denmark until I seen a very realistic looking Aggar in the background to the right. Player models in this game piss all over Fifa's. Though there is less detail in kits and the shorts look a little plastic. It still looks top notch. Still, I see where you are coming from, though I'd rather gameplay be perfected first, and graphics later, which will come as the series progresses. At least Pro Evo gives you an excuse to go and buy the game because of the steady progression.

In reply to

[quote=LEBATO]It looks really awful, like they don't even remotely care to make any substantial improvements.  Not buying this crap, not for $60.

Let's not forget that the biggest excuse for raising the price for next gen games was that graphics artists were a huge demand, and graphics this, graphics that.........all this just doesn't apply to this game at all.  They finally got rid of the cardboard crowd, I can't see much else besides that.  Player likeness is just awful too.  So where exactly is this money going since they obviously aren't using it for licenses? (they lose them)

I mean, the difference is obvious to last gen, but I don't see my extra $10.[/quote]

Player likeness is awful? I looked at image two and didn't know it was Denmark until I seen a very realistic looking Aggar in the background to the right. Player models in this game piss all over Fifa's. Though there is less detail in kits and the shorts look a little plastic. It still looks top notch. Still, I see where you are coming from, though I'd rather gameplay be perfected first, and graphics later, which will come as the series progresses. At least Pro Evo gives you an excuse to go and buy the game because of the steady progression.

itaintrite

Commented on 2007-09-12 05:17:56

Still undecided whether the PS3 or 360 version will get my cash though.

If you're a serious PES fan, that should be a simple decision. PS3 controller vs 360 controller for PES.

In reply to