December being pretty quiet in terms of new releases, let's keep offering you a bunch of next gen videos, courtesy of our new capture card. Killzone: Shadow Fall is back on Gamersyde and we hope you'll take the time to download all the gameplay footage we have in store for you guys. Enjoy!
All comments (46)
MP was horrible as well, made me appreciate KZ3 much more.
I hope GG goes back to KZ2/3 route after this since i am sure we will get atleast another KZ title on PS4 since we got two titles on PS3.
Right now though i just wanna see what this new IP is that they're cooking. Visuals are in the bag...just a case of seeing what it is. I keep hearing fantasy rpg...would be cool.
I removed my captures off facebook, went on my laptop to check they uploaded ok and they make games look bad lol
The still capture is ok but again could look better as it does not look the same detail as the game.
Im a big fan of killzone 2 and i found i could play that over and over and would not get bored, with shadow fall it was good in parts but boring in others.
I was only ever wowed by the graphics on the outside scenes too, the forest looked great with the rock textures that still looked amazing close up, and the lighting through the trees.
The city looked amazing too, BUT i found alot of the game looked bland, maybe i was expecting too much but all of the indoor parts of the game looked crappy specially textures, as if they spent most of the time making the forest levels and making the city looks good then made the rest quick. The start where your a child too did not wow at all.
Textures on boxes and items and objects around all the levels looked not too great, the rain looks horrid for next gen, white lines and the raindrops bouncing looked very last gen, even splashes on the river/streams looked horrid.
Character models other than the helghast looked pretty bad, which i found strange because they say the cutscenes are all inengine yet that female Dr/scientist looked great in the cutscenes but when we see her in the actual gameplay in the Lab she looked terrible....mouth movements were bad all around too.
I will say the worst textures i saw in this game which are not forgivable were the trees in the forest section and the logs, from far away they looked to be good but as soon as you got slightly close they had the bioshock texture look to them.. shiny jelly looking, not a hint of bark texture at all...if you played bioshock you will know what i mean.
The smoke effects were bad too and last gen, then i see the tech video for the division where everything looks fantastic and the smoke looks almost real.
As you can see im pretty dissapointed, this game could have been alot more gameplay wise but for me graphics were a let down too, for me 30% of the graphics looked next gen
I know graphics are not everything but when the gameplay is not 100% and its a exclusive next gen game i did expect more.
Then you see demos of the division and they look far better, i know this is the 1st batch of next gen games and things always get better, plus the developers did not even use alot of the tech the ps4 has for this game
I would suggest slapping yourself across the face, buying some specs, boxing up the console and giving it to someone who can appreciate it. Lol
And if this is how all starts (1080p lol) then games like God of War next-gen, Uncharted next-gen...etc. will be pure eye candy when it comes to graphics, especially God of War since it is known their ways of making battles is in epic (yes, epic as in huge/big scale, word used right lol) scale to showcase everything.
And no, you are probably the one playing the different version or have insane graphical standard.
Yes some trees upclose looked bad, but then there were some that had great texture work on it which i know someone at Neogaf posted a screenshot of it.
But even on PC with everything maxed, you are bound to find bad textures here and there even today.
Lol. Game looks stunning.
But hey if you dont like the graphics, it cant be helped.
And Sath....pre-rendered? You mean the backgrounds? Cause at first glance it all looked 3D to me. Real objects, buildings etc. Interesting how plenty of people seem really disappointed in this game and others love it. Angry Joe's review didn't make me exactly excited about the campaign, goddamn.
watch this video its only in 720p but the start where you are in the aircraft to when you land, this looks far far better than what we actually got
The lighting is better, the buildings look better, as the aircraft goes to land look at those crates that are covered in the blue material, look at how real it looks blowing in the wind then look at that in the final game as your playing lol it is totally different and not as good,and the texture of it is far better than what we got
the texture on the floors as you land and the rest of the city, even the aircraft flying around and the ones that come close to ground and to top it off in the video above looks that how real that steam/smoke looks from those chimney vents
then look at what we got, its obvious they upped the graphics to show these videos off then downgraded them, maybe they did not have time to make it all right for release
Looks as good or better to me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kwm6cJdOx-M&list=SP...
the forest looked good till you got close to the trees etc, the rock textures did look good though i will admit
BUT as soon as you went inside the buildings BAM it looked like a ps3 game
objects inside looked like they were quickly modeled
Did you see characters in some of the levels walk through doorways that had a little step haha the animation was so bad specially that dr/scientist women where you follow her around .
the blue material we see in everylevel flapping around looks bad texture wise too compare to old videos
not to mention the trees and leaves blowing in the wind, they all have the same animation, and they are not even singular either they are all in the same bunches and each bunch blows the same even when their dosnt seem to be a reason for them to be blowing around