Xbox 360

You may remember a few weeks ago when I put online a video of World Air Force while complaining about the bad quality. Well, no reason to complain anymore since here it is in 720p ! Meanwhile the game has also changed name, you should now all call it "Over-G: Energy Airforce". Yay.

Video gallery

  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
  • Over-G: Energy Airforce TGS video - Video gallery
puertorican2134
puertorican2134
Commented on 2005-11-01 23:14:34
Looks damn nice, except for the ground, reminds me of Ace Combat 2 for PS(the ground)
In reply to
Mariochief
Mariochief
Commented on 2005-11-01 23:18:54
wOW is that how the ground suppose to look next gen?
In reply to
Snoopers - Gameboy
Snoopers
Commented on 2005-11-01 23:28:48
Looks horrible, but the music was real fun. Good point for that.
In reply to
Manager - Shemale
Manager
Commented on 2005-11-01 23:41:46 In reply to Snoopers
Posted by snoopers
Looks horrible
Oh no. No. Snoopers has turned into a true spoiled whiner!! .____.

Seriously, I almost need to start MSN for that. That so does NOT look bad. OK for the ground, but they have time to shape it up.
In reply to
LEBATO - IS WRONG
LEBATO
Commented on 2005-11-01 23:52:39 In reply to Manager
Posted by Manager
Oh no. No. Snoopers has turned into a true spoiled whiner!! .____.

Seriously, I almost need to start MSN for that. That so does NOT look bad. OK for the ground, but they have time to shape it up.
You don't know what you are talking about, snoopers probably does. Go play AirForce Delta Storm for the xbox, that was one of the first Xbox games and it looks just as good as this crap minus the draw distance.......

Seriously, if you haven't played AirForce Delta for the xbox, you don't know what you are talking aobut, even the water and lighting looked better. This seems like a port (I know is not) to get any money they can taking advantage of launch.

It DOES look horrible when you consider it is a next gen title.
In reply to
mehdino1
mehdino1
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:00:16
realy good.
In reply to
Manager - Shemale
Manager
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:09:27
LEBATO:
Yes, even though Airforce DS looked great, I'm sure this will be a completely different thing. The planes were really slow in DS, due to the lack of power of the Xbox. I'm sure they can really speed up things in Over G, making it feel like a REAL simulator. The trailers they've released have really focused on the speed, on how real planes really fly.

I guess Xbox 1 had trouble reading all that info in with those speeds, but X360 will have no problems with it. And yes, even though the ground (not the buildings) in Over G is a bit dissapointing, they still should make the game interesting by adding a great sense of speed and thrilling dogfights.
As people said about PGR3 when the ground pictures was released: "Who cares about the ground, when you will be traveling over it in 200 mph?"
In reply to
grifter_66
grifter_66
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:15:51 In reply to mehdino1
This game looks like crap for any generation. I might be impressed if it was an N64 title. I love these games I just wish that a good dev team would make one for once. Did you all see the burner and exhaust effects for the missiles terrible, plane physics and animation was atrocious. If I was M$ I would can the game and lock the dev team in the cellar so the can never torture innocent gamers with these horrible video again.

Of course if the game we are seeing is under 40% complete it might have potential.
In reply to
Nossy
Nossy
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:20:41
Could use some anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering. That battleship looks horrible. Water looks horrible. DOA has better looking water effects. Especially when there's next to NOTHING going on in the background to prevent them from using any effects or high res textures.
In reply to
PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
PlumbDrumb
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:23:09 In reply to grifter_66
Posted by grifter_66
This game looks like crap for any generation. I might be impressed if it was an N64 title.
I agree that it's not the most graphically attractive title coming out, but that statement is just balls to the wall, ummm... I don't want to even say.
In reply to
toelessfoot
toelessfoot
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:31:40
I'm actually really looking forward to it since PC simulations are all but dead and i've heard that this game is very realistic on the highest difficulty settings. I think the next trailer we see of this is going to look quite a bit better than this.
In reply to
LEBATO - IS WRONG
LEBATO
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:46:21 In reply to Manager
Posted by Manager
LEBATO:
Yes, even though Airforce DS looked great, I'm sure this will be a completely different thing. The planes were really slow in DS, due to the lack of power of the Xbox. I'm sure they can really speed up things in Over G, making it feel like a REAL simulator. The trailers they've released have really focused on the speed, on how real planes really fly.

I guess Xbox 1 had trouble reading all that info in with those speeds, but X360 will have no problems with it. And yes, even though the ground (not the buildings) in Over G is a bit dissapointing, they still should make the game interesting by adding a great sense of speed and thrilling dogfights.
As people said about PGR3 when the ground pictures was released: "Who cares about the ground, when you will be traveling over it in 200 mph?"
NO!

The jets were not slow in Airforce Delta, just get closer to the ground to notice the speed, but if we are talking about speed, what makes World Airforce such a showcase as far as sense of speed is concerned? It looked the same to me.

And no, this is no simulator and Airforce Delta was not either. Whoever said they moved realistically? Of course, they move the flaps, land, etc, but that doesn't make it realistic. If you are looking for a simulator, go play some Flight Simulator 2004, that's the best and only one simulator available right now that gets it right.
In reply to
LEBATO - IS WRONG
LEBATO
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:47:12 In reply to grifter_66
Posted by grifter_66
This game looks like crap for any generation. I might be impressed if it was an N64 title. I love these games I just wish that a good dev team would make one for once. Did you all see the burner and exhaust effects for the missiles terrible, plane physics and animation was atrocious. If I was M$ I would can the game and lock the dev team in the cellar so the can never torture innocent gamers with these horrible video again.

Of course if the game we are seeing is under 40% complete it might have potential.
Totally agree :D
.
.
.
.
Except for the N64 part :|
In reply to
LEBATO - IS WRONG
LEBATO
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:49:59 In reply to toelessfoot
Posted by toelessfoot
I'm actually really looking forward to it since PC simulations are all but dead and i've heard that this game is very realistic on the highest difficulty settings. I think the next trailer we see of this is going to look quite a bit better than this.
Again, this is NOT a simulator. What makes you people think so?

Simulators:
Flight Simlutar 2004
Su-27 Flanker--I hope someone knows about this game.
In reply to
LEBATO - IS WRONG
LEBATO
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:57:22
Here's the game I'm talking about, although VERY old, it's still a good simulator.

In reply to
PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
PlumbDrumb
Commented on 2005-11-02 00:59:42
omg

/Lebato dies of old age
In reply to
XSAVAGE
XSAVAGE
Commented on 2005-11-02 01:04:15
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here
Is a game made by Jap Developers , dont expect much.
toelessfoot
toelessfoot
Commented on 2005-11-02 03:10:01 In reply to LEBATO
Posted by LEBATO
Again, this is NOT a simulator. What makes you people think so?

Simulators:
Flight Simlutar 2004
Su-27 Flanker--I hope someone knows about this game.
it might not be a true simulator ala Lock On or IL2, but from a preview i read, on the realistic settings you must operate radar and countermesures, aswell as change flap angle and raise\lower landing gear. Plus it has a realistic draw distance. I might not be like the afformentioned games but it'll be the most realistic air combat game to ever grace consoles that's for sure.
In reply to
sciencedude7
sciencedude7
Commented on 2005-11-02 05:44:16 In reply to toelessfoot
lebato, check out x-plane, it is the most realistic simulator i have ever seen. I have played all of the flight simulators and it think x-planes physics are much more advanced.
http://www.x-plane.com/
In reply to
munkieNS
munkieNS
Commented on 2005-11-02 06:34:31
Yeah, this looks like total and absolute horse shit. What the fuck is up with the water? My Dreamcast could render better water for God's sake. At least throw a damned cube map on that shit, it's not even pixel shaded.
In reply to
McErono
McErono
Commented on 2005-11-02 09:02:22
going back to MS FS2004... horrible...
In reply to
foreigner
foreigner
Commented on 2005-11-02 09:05:05 In reply to toelessfoot
Posted by toelessfoot
it might not be a true simulator ala Lock On or IL2, but from a preview i read, on the realistic settings you must operate radar and countermesures, aswell as change flap angle and raiselower landing gear. Plus it has a realistic draw distance. I might not be like the afformentioned games but it'll be the most realistic air combat game to ever grace consoles that's for sure.
I agree.
This is a 50/50 arcade/simulator and it ll be also the game with the most -near to photorealism- visuals from any other air combat game.
In reply to
PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
PlumbDrumb
Commented on 2005-11-02 09:21:19
The graphics aren't very good, but it should be really fun on Live.
In reply to
Dangerous
Dangerous
Commented on 2005-11-02 10:07:25
I heard that its only 5% complete
In reply to
Manager - Shemale
Manager
Commented on 2005-11-02 10:36:21
LEBATO:
Yes, but just because Flight Simulator 2004 is a simulator, it doesn't mean that Over-G can be one. I might be at a dead end here, as I really don't know the genre that well.
But this can be a simulator, right? Just with weapons and stuff *remember MS Combat Flight Simulator*. Maybe a little bit more arcadey, but still...

If Forza Motorsport is a car simulator, this is god damn a flight simulaltor. ;)
In reply to
About the game
Platform
X360
Published by
Ubisoft
Developed by
Taito Corporation
Patreon

$135 of $400 per month

What's up?
  • Loakum

    Loakum @Driftwood Awesome! I’m loving it! It does show a much crisper picture and the frame rate looks good! I was playing Stella Blade and Dragonball Soarkling Blast! :) (2 Weeks ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood @Loakum: enjoy, the one Sony sent us will be there on launch day. Coverage will follow asap. (2 Weeks ago)

  • Loakum

    Loakum *takes a large sip of victorious grape juice* ok….my PS5 pro arrived early! So much winning! :) (2 Weeks ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood @reneyvane: non ils l'ont publié le 1er octobre et je crois que tu l'avais déjà linkée. ;) (5 Weeks ago)

  • reneyvane

    reneyvane Factornews à joué à KingdomComeDeliverance2 au Gamescom 2024 mais ne publie sa preview que maintenant ? [url] (7 Weeks ago)

  • CraCra

    CraCra Y a un souci sur les forums ? (8 Weeks ago)

  • nostradamus

    nostradamus very few with religious beliefs are naive or zealots, but for sure don't find amusing their beliefs being thrown in for clout. maybe STFU with that discourse? (11 Weeks ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)

Also on Gamersyde

The First 43 Minutes of Loco Motive

  • Thursday, November 21, 2024
  • Driftwood

Our Switch video of Ys X: Nordics

  • Wednesday, November 20, 2024
  • davton

The Callisto Protocol is now PS5 Pro Enhanced

  • Wednesday, November 20, 2024
  • Driftwood