THQ has released the first trailer for Saints Row: The Third (about 2 seconds of actual gameplay footage...). The game, developed by Volition, will be available this holiday for Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and PC.
i kinda liked the first game, but the second just seemed like a ton of childish mini-games to distract from the fact the game had very little real substance, and was of very poor quality. just seems like a blatant clone of GTA dont infinately worse? but that's just me.
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:23:16 In reply to KORNdog
Posted by KORNdog
i kinda liked the first game, but the second just seemed like a ton of childish mini-games to distrat from the fact the game had very little real substance, and was of very poor quality. just seems like a blatant clone of GTA dont infinately worse? but that's just me.
I love both Saints Row.
I love all the GTAs - even the old top down ones.
I love Just Cause 2.
I love Red Dead Redemption.
I love all the Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
I love all the Assassin's Creeds.
I love Red Faction Guerrilla.
I love Bully.
I love Morrowind and Oblivion.
I think there is a pattern here, but I just can't quite put my finger on it. But I got a really good feeling that I am going to love Saints Row: The Third.
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:57:07 In reply to FreeSwag
Posted by FreeSwag
I love both Saints Row.
I love all the GTAs - even the old top down ones.
I love Just Cause 2.
I love Red Dead Redemption.
I love all the Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
I love all the Assassin's Creeds.
I love Red Faction Guerrilla.
I love Bully.
I love Morrowind and Oblivion.
I think there is a pattern here, but I just can't quite put my finger on it. But I got a really good feeling that I am going to love Saints Row: The Third.
I really enjoyed the first game, but the second just went a little too childish for me. I realize they are trying to differentiate from GTA IV's more serious and mature tone, but it was bit over the top for me. Still a fun game though.
They really need to do something different with SR3 if they want to get most consumers attention. I really don't feel like driving around for hours on end shooting up opposing gangsta's again. I was hoping that since this is supposed to take place in a smaller, more rural area, that we might get to see Red Faction Guerillas destruction engine (which they own), but I imagine if they had something that cool to hype, they would be hyping it already. If they added that and a driving engine where the cars didn't feel like weightless toys, I would be in 100%!
Commented on 2011-04-03 20:04:39 In reply to michaelob
Posted by michaelob
I really enjoyed the first game, but the second just went a little too childish for me. I realize they are trying to differentiate from GTA IV's more serious and mature tone, but it was bit over the top for me. Still a fun game though.
They really need to do something different with SR3 if they want to get most consumers attention. I really don't feel like driving around for hours on end shooting up opposing gangsta's again. I was hoping that since this is supposed to take place in a smaller, more rural area, that we might get to see Red Faction Guerillas destruction engine (which they own), but I imagine if they had something that cool to hype, they would be hyping it already. If they added that and a driving engine where the cars didn't feel like weightless toys, I would be in 100%!
Commented on 2011-04-05 02:14:37 In reply to digi_matrix
Posted by digi_matrix
You want weighty driving...like GTA 4?
I'll admit that GTA IV's driving was a bit too weighty, but it sure as hell beat Saints Rows cars that felt like little cardboard toys. At least GTA IV had a decent damage model with chassis deformation. SR cars just get crinkly like they are wrapped in tin foil when you crash them.
I would say a driving model somewhere in between the two. I think GTA IV's cars felt nice and weighty, but they lacked traction. SR's cars felt really light and responsive, but with TOO much traction and not enough mass. If you ever played the old Driver games, I think those struck the perfect balance. The cars felt really good and weighty, but they also had enough traction to carry weight around corners, as opposed to GTA IV where you slid right on through because the cars lacked traction. That's just my .02.
Loakum
@Driftwood Awesome! I’m loving it! It does show a much crisper picture and the frame rate looks good! I was playing Stella Blade and Dragonball Soarkling Blast! :) (2 Days ago)
Driftwood
@Loakum: enjoy, the one Sony sent us will be there on launch day. Coverage will follow asap. (3 Days ago)
Loakum
*takes a large sip of victorious grape juice* ok….my PS5 pro arrived early! So much winning! :) (4 Days ago)
Driftwood
@reneyvane: non ils l'ont publié le 1er octobre et je crois que tu l'avais déjà linkée. ;) (3 Weeks ago)
reneyvane
Factornews à joué à KingdomComeDeliverance2 au Gamescom 2024 mais ne publie sa preview que maintenant ? [url] (5 Weeks ago)
CraCra
Y a un souci sur les forums ? (6 Weeks ago)
nostradamus
very few with religious beliefs are naive or zealots, but for sure don't find amusing their beliefs being thrown in for clout. maybe STFU with that discourse? (9 Weeks ago)
Driftwood
Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (19)
Commented on 2011-04-01 12:16:56
Commented on 2011-04-01 12:24:51 In reply to bleachedsmiles
Commented on 2011-04-01 13:58:09
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:13:22
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:13:30
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:23:16 In reply to KORNdog
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:40:34
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:52:12I love all the GTAs - even the old top down ones.
I love Just Cause 2.
I love Red Dead Redemption.
I love all the Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
I love all the Assassin's Creeds.
I love Red Faction Guerrilla.
I love Bully.
I love Morrowind and Oblivion.
I think there is a pattern here, but I just can't quite put my finger on it. But I got a really good feeling that I am going to love Saints Row: The Third.
And life is good.
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:57:07 In reply to FreeSwagI love all the GTAs - even the old top down ones.
I love Just Cause 2.
I love Red Dead Redemption.
I love all the Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
I love all the Assassin's Creeds.
I love Red Faction Guerrilla.
I love Bully.
I love Morrowind and Oblivion.
I think there is a pattern here, but I just can't quite put my finger on it. But I got a really good feeling that I am going to love Saints Row: The Third.
And life is good.
Commented on 2011-04-01 14:58:54
Commented on 2011-04-01 15:00:24
Commented on 2011-04-01 15:10:04 In reply to TomarruTypo _ Rehab
Commented on 2011-04-01 20:29:47 In reply to digi_matrix
Commented on 2011-04-02 21:04:25
Commented on 2011-04-02 21:34:12 In reply to JBear
Commented on 2011-04-03 01:04:52 In reply to KostchtchieCan't wait for this. Only worry I have is that THQ has been doing some pretty shady things of recent regarding multiplayer.
Commented on 2011-04-03 07:24:53They really need to do something different with SR3 if they want to get most consumers attention. I really don't feel like driving around for hours on end shooting up opposing gangsta's again. I was hoping that since this is supposed to take place in a smaller, more rural area, that we might get to see Red Faction Guerillas destruction engine (which they own), but I imagine if they had something that cool to hype, they would be hyping it already. If they added that and a driving engine where the cars didn't feel like weightless toys, I would be in 100%!
Commented on 2011-04-03 20:04:39 In reply to michaelobThey really need to do something different with SR3 if they want to get most consumers attention. I really don't feel like driving around for hours on end shooting up opposing gangsta's again. I was hoping that since this is supposed to take place in a smaller, more rural area, that we might get to see Red Faction Guerillas destruction engine (which they own), but I imagine if they had something that cool to hype, they would be hyping it already. If they added that and a driving engine where the cars didn't feel like weightless toys, I would be in 100%!
Commented on 2011-04-05 02:14:37 In reply to digi_matrixI would say a driving model somewhere in between the two. I think GTA IV's cars felt nice and weighty, but they lacked traction. SR's cars felt really light and responsive, but with TOO much traction and not enough mass. If you ever played the old Driver games, I think those struck the perfect balance. The cars felt really good and weighty, but they also had enough traction to carry weight around corners, as opposed to GTA IV where you slid right on through because the cars lacked traction. That's just my .02.