NBA Live 06 video

Commented on 2005-10-29 11:00:08

i demand that this movie be reposted under the 2k6 trailer as showcase to its emberassment

In reply to

Slabs

Commented on 2005-10-29 11:02:37

I said it before but I really think the presentation is stunning, just the herky-jerky gameplay lets it down.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 11:21:32 In reply to phillymantis

Posted by phillymantis

i demand that this movie be reposted under the 2k6 trailer as showcase to its emberassment

you crack me up dude.

Both games look great, but I have to give the polished edge to 2k6 right now.
That dripping sweat in Live is neat though.
I'd probably enjoy playing either one of them.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 11:26:08

Presentation and graphics are great. Not to sure about the camera angle, and it hurt me to watch that guy play it.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 11:38:49

please dont put live anywhere near the next gen quality of 2k6 it just wouldnt survive....have you seen 2k6 lighting on the court

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 11:45:26

from what most people are saying about gameplay differences and such, it sounds like Live may be best for a quick romp with your buddies on the couch, whereas 2k6 would be more suited for long term enjoyment.

OMG, did I just say "quick romp with your buddies on the couch"!!?
Uh, carry on.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 12:05:23 In reply to PlumbDrumb

Posted by PlumbDrumb

OMG, did I just say "quick romp with your buddies on the couch"!!?

Yeah, i think you did.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 12:16:12

My dirty little secret has been exposed!

In reply to

OriginalBuckRogers

Commented on 2005-10-29 12:47:45

this game looks pretty stunning. unfortunately the players still have their "dead eyes"... they look like zombies, i hope they can fix this 'cause everything else is looking so fine.

In reply to

XTRACLIPS

Commented on 2005-10-29 12:56:06

I think Live looks more visually stunning than 2K but we'll have to see which is more enjoyable. I have to give Live an edge on the sweat levels and lighting.

In reply to

Manager

Commented on 2005-10-29 13:41:02

LOL I hardly ever laugh at any other person playing, but damn - that pregame sequence was priceless. I love how the player ended up standing like 0.5 meter from the (forgot-the-word, "goal") and stood there happely and proud scoring points 0.5 meters from it. ;)
I love how he missed the dunks too! :D

I haven't played NBA-games for like five years, but they sure must have gotten harder.

(And if it's blim who's playing: please don't fire me)

In reply to

BlimBlim

Commented on 2005-10-29 13:55:37 In reply to Manager

It was snoopers :D

In reply to

Gamer2k

Commented on 2005-10-29 13:56:45

live looks good too I'm gonna rent it to try it out on the 360 I really want 2k6 though

In reply to

fohammer

Commented on 2005-10-29 14:02:14

If the videos for NBA 2k6 were replaced with these videos you guys would still hate on live. EA=no love. I think live looks better, but arcade BB is not for me. i will wait for the reviews. According to EA live 360 is different from current gen live.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 14:10:08 In reply to fohammer

Posted by fohammer

If the videos for NBA 2k6 were replaced with these videos you guys would still hate on live. EA=no love.

I agree. But i have to admit that i stay clear from EA titles (eg james bonds, and need for speeds, etc.) But EA sports is a different matter. Fifa, NHL, Live and Madden are brilliantly playable and are the best games when you have three mates sitting next to u.
NBA 2k is a bit more serious, and is for the lone gamer that wants to journey through whole seasons and franchises.
If nba live 06 had the dunk contest that made 05 such a hit, it would destroy 2K.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 14:47:08

it still features that damn dead eyes issue...thats something thats more acceptable on a current gen game....and the clothing seems not moving at all...unlike in nba2k6...

In reply to

OriginalBuckRogers

Commented on 2005-10-29 14:54:27

btw. it's more like "falling to sleep-eyes" ;)

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 15:00:01 In reply to OriginalBuckRogers

Posted by OriginalBuckRogers

btw. it's more like "falling to sleep-eyes" ;)

ur right,lol

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 15:02:34

omg how is live more visually stunning??? 2k has moving jerseys realtime lighting better skin shading...wet sweat drenched jerseys...and the sweat in 2k actually pools up and doesnt just make unrealistic beads pouring like blood from the head. If you think live is more visually stunning your on crack its that simple

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 15:03:35

i mean whats with the tucked in jersey lump giving every player wide hips?? the dead eyes?? the jerky animations and dribbling?? the lighting is no where near 2k your blind

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 15:05:46 In reply to phillymantis

Posted by phillymantis

i mean whats with the tucked in jersey lump giving every player wide hips?? the dead eyes?? the jerky animations and dribbling?? the lighting is no where near 2k your blind

that dead eyes syndrome is the thing that bother me the most....

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 15:07:54

man, ease up there phillymantis.

In reply to

Commented on 2005-10-29 15:26:28 In reply to phillymantis

Posted by phillymantis

Visually stunning means more than nice charactors. Live has better stadiums, baskets, crowds and a really good atmosphere. Everything is a lot more smooth as well. 2K is jaggy and has crap animation.
Live is Visually stunning.

In reply to