2K Games released these three images from Bioshock, to be released around June. It was recently confirmed on the official website that the game is single-player only (surprise!), but also that a new in-game trailer will be released in less than a month - we can't wait.
Patreon
All comments (20)
Commented on 2007-02-09 23:13:39
Commented on 2007-02-09 23:33:39Thx Manager.
Commented on 2007-02-09 23:57:07 In reply to xbox360
Commented on 2007-02-09 23:59:41Also, the setting and the story seem very promising and the upgrade system just finishes it off making it one of my most anticipated titles of 2007..!
Commented on 2007-02-10 00:03:22
Commented on 2007-02-10 00:15:41 In reply to ACEfromRussia
Commented on 2007-02-10 00:36:10 In reply to ACEfromRussiaScreenshots especially direct feed ones always look significantly worse than the game. I'm positive when we see gameplay footage running at a great framerate concerns will disappear.
Commented on 2007-02-10 00:56:50This game always looks great. I really hope this game isn't short though. I REALLY hope it isn't. I'm definitely looking forward to this game.
One more thing. They need to add more looping animations to the "idle gun" sequence. In that one long video, there was only ONE and it was way too obvious. It needs to be more natural, and there needs to be more than one. Also, the gun-bob needs to slow down when walking at a slower pace, instead of always flopping all over the place, unrealistically. Granted, these obvious problems may have been due to the fact that the video was early. But, you know…
Commented on 2007-02-10 00:59:13 In reply to Optimusv2Screenshots especially direct feed ones always look significantly worse than the game. I'm positive when we see gameplay footage running at a great framerate concerns will disappear.
Polygons and texture resolutions aren't going to increase while running on my 360. It's not a magic graphics box. What you're seeing in these screens is what the game actually looks like.
Commented on 2007-02-10 01:12:47 In reply to Optimusv2Screenshots especially direct feed ones always look significantly worse than the game. I'm positive when we see gameplay footage running at a great framerate concerns will disappear.
and how U axplane good textures on walls and all architecture, but not chars???
Commented on 2007-02-10 01:27:36 In reply to Freniger
Commented on 2007-02-10 01:54:33 In reply to ACEfromRussiaand how U axplane good textures on walls and all architecture, but not chars???
All screens look bad compared to the full game. Look at ANY screenshot of a game you owe... I promise you, it'll look horrible in comparison. Unless the description has HD Quality advertised all over it.
I guess they don't want to use too much money on capturing screens, or maybe the sites don't want high quality images filling their servers....
So it's not that the 360 is a "magic box", it's that the images are poorly captured or compressed.
Commented on 2007-02-10 02:11:49
Commented on 2007-02-10 05:11:39
Commented on 2007-02-10 11:07:42Christ i cant wait for this game!
Commented on 2007-02-10 13:12:37
Commented on 2007-02-10 16:06:34
Commented on 2007-02-11 02:02:13
Commented on 2007-02-11 21:36:17Bioware certainly are having problems with dressing up the old UT engine into next-gen glory. Perhaps there is an underlying gpu-draining effect that is not apparent in still shots, but in return there is an acute lack of parallax mapping, texture resolution, af and detail textures. Or maybe something as simple and overpowering as the lack of texture streaming in the old engine (one of the most important benefits in UE3/GoW)
Commented on 2007-02-12 14:06:33