i have a couple friends that played the beta at my place and now they're really into it, i'll pick up a copy eventually. the GOW3 ultimate trilogy edition has taken a toll on my wallet.lol http://images.webhallen.com/files/gow3large.jpg
looks like any 3rd paty generic fps. But for some reasons, i see the game having more sales and appeal to the fanbase, than other online offers as Killzone 2.
I was in both beta's, the shooting is horrible in my opinion.
The sound is bad, bullets sounds like paintball or something.
The feel of the shooting was bad as well, you cant see any reaction to the weapons when shooting which decreases the satistfaction of shooting in general.
The animations are very old and bad, if anything. The reloading, aiming, throwing grenades, it looks like they didnt know how to animate at all and it looks stiff.
After countless of FPS this generation you would think these guys would do their homework and not just throw in 256 players and call it "awesome", because its not.
But as I said, the whole shooting and animations are what is dissapointing to me in this game, it just looks and feels like last generation of gaming.
"Polished recoil effect for better realism."
"Fixed offset muzzle flash effect."
"Tuned camera to shake more realistically when hit by bullets."
"Added alternate reload animation."
Those four are the ones I want to see what they have done.
I'm definitely getting this one. I want to try these massive battles. Did enyone try FragFX on PS3 is it worth buying? Can anyone share their knowladge. BFBC2 will be better on PC.
Some reviews are out 8/10. 3 PMC's you are supposed to form a team and progress. It has death-match and others too. But it seems more like PC style also looks wise it is ok not very good but that was expected TBH
cant see this selling well for sony...i think it's one of those idealistic games, where you fantisize of awesome battles on the scale of a full out war...where everybody on your team works together, and communicates.
The reality will always be players working for their own kills, a lack of communication other than the odd kid playing some music down his mic, lag, and an almost empty game world as the maps are designed to hold 200+ but very few invested in the game.
Commented on 2010-01-26 21:07:51 In reply to Slabs
Posted by Slabs
256 players is the big selling point and it shows.
It's a new IP. It's a PS3 exclusive. It looks average at best. The only thing that could save it is word of mouth and when I read the impressions of the people who played it, it doesn't look like it will have that either.
-> It won't sell. Don't even think they will break even.
i enjoyed the beta a lot, it's not a one man army game like MW2, you just feel like a small cog in a very VERY large machine, but i wont be picking it up day one, too many games these next few months that are priority (heavy rain, GOW3, yakuza 3), will pick it up some time later tho, with the official headset probably, since i'm still using the socom headset...lol.
Commented on 2010-01-26 22:55:28 In reply to Viginti_Tres
Posted by Viginti_Tres
It's a new IP. It's a PS3 exclusive. It looks average at best. The only thing that could save it is word of mouth and when I read the impressions of the people who played it, it doesn't look like it will have that either.
-> It won't sell. Don't even think they will break even.
I think it would have sold better w/out the beta to be honest. Everyone was interested in the game leading up to the beta, and when playing it all I hear for the most part were people talking about how let down they were by the game.
I think the beta turned a lot of people off from the game. Other AAA shooters just have a level of gameplay polish that makes this look very amateurish.
Commented on 2010-01-26 23:14:00 In reply to Sarunas
Posted by Sarunas
I'm definitely getting this one. I want to try these massive battles. Did enyone try FragFX on PS3 is it worth buying? Can anyone share their knowladge. BFBC2 will be better on PC.
Don't buy the FragFx instead go for the FragNstein m8 it works much better!
Anyway i agree with Sath on this one, shooting and running just feel so generic, it just feels like everything is on rails but that hasn't stopped me buying the bloody thing :)
getting this along with bfbc2, best shooters out there for open world style gameplay, sick the generic run around house/yard feel gameplay of mw2 and its crap everyone for them self attitude with there care packages, only thing mw2 has over these to games is its deep customization
I just watched live stream for this game and I can say that the reloading animation is much improved. The animation doesnt "skip" frames, its much smoother now and you cana ctually see the entire reloading which is good.
But the aiming is still skipping frames a bit, it doesnt look like the weapon is moving from the hip to infront of you.
But from what I have seen from the released version interms of animations, its much better.
Even with my complaints, I bought it when it came out.
Its very addicting.
One thing that I love about the game is the big open war, reminds me of Frontlines fuel of War, except there is no "war toys" or vehicles to control and less futuristic (which is a shame), other than the transport vehicles.
Anyways, I think its a pretty cool game, but i still think the gunplay is bad compared to MW and Crysis.
The guns damage seems off from faction to faction, atleast the assault rifles.
It feels they didnt put alot of effort into the Raven AR like they did with Valor and SVER.
I tried all factions to the point to try the cool scopes and the AR and Raven lacks that "punch" when shooting while Valor has the best one and then SVER then Raven.
I still went with Raven though considering I love the concept of high-tech sleek look that makes them look like a international "counter terrorist" force.
One thing is that my sister which is around 27 years old was addicted to Warhawk is in love with MAG now, both actually and she hated the beta like I did :)
Loakum
@Driftwood Awesome! I’m loving it! It does show a much crisper picture and the frame rate looks good! I was playing Stella Blade and Dragonball Soarkling Blast! :) (4 Days ago)
Driftwood
@Loakum: enjoy, the one Sony sent us will be there on launch day. Coverage will follow asap. (6 Days ago)
Loakum
*takes a large sip of victorious grape juice* ok….my PS5 pro arrived early! So much winning! :) (6 Days ago)
Driftwood
@reneyvane: non ils l'ont publié le 1er octobre et je crois que tu l'avais déjà linkée. ;) (4 Weeks ago)
reneyvane
Factornews à joué à KingdomComeDeliverance2 au Gamescom 2024 mais ne publie sa preview que maintenant ? [url] (5 Weeks ago)
CraCra
Y a un souci sur les forums ? (7 Weeks ago)
nostradamus
very few with religious beliefs are naive or zealots, but for sure don't find amusing their beliefs being thrown in for clout. maybe STFU with that discourse? (10 Weeks ago)
Driftwood
Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (18)
Commented on 2010-01-26 14:12:41http://images.webhallen.com/files/gow3large.jpg
Commented on 2010-01-26 14:46:37
Commented on 2010-01-26 14:50:47The sound is bad, bullets sounds like paintball or something.
The feel of the shooting was bad as well, you cant see any reaction to the weapons when shooting which decreases the satistfaction of shooting in general.
The animations are very old and bad, if anything. The reloading, aiming, throwing grenades, it looks like they didnt know how to animate at all and it looks stiff.
After countless of FPS this generation you would think these guys would do their homework and not just throw in 256 players and call it "awesome", because its not.
But as I said, the whole shooting and animations are what is dissapointing to me in this game, it just looks and feels like last generation of gaming.
This is the stuff they have fixed for the final game since the beta... http://blog.mag.com/blog/2010/01/mag-beta-vs-final... and some comments here http://blog.us.playstation.com/2010/01/mag-beta-vs...
"Polished recoil effect for better realism."
"Fixed offset muzzle flash effect."
"Tuned camera to shake more realistically when hit by bullets."
"Added alternate reload animation."
Those four are the ones I want to see what they have done.
Commented on 2010-01-26 15:03:11 In reply to Sath
Commented on 2010-01-26 16:36:44
Commented on 2010-01-26 16:55:59Doesn't help that the actual shooting feels so lame.
Commented on 2010-01-26 18:11:27
Commented on 2010-01-26 20:38:43The reality will always be players working for their own kills, a lack of communication other than the odd kid playing some music down his mic, lag, and an almost empty game world as the maps are designed to hold 200+ but very few invested in the game.
We shall see..
Commented on 2010-01-26 21:07:51 In reply to Slabs-> It won't sell. Don't even think they will break even.
Commented on 2010-01-26 21:14:35
Commented on 2010-01-26 22:55:28 In reply to Viginti_Tres-> It won't sell. Don't even think they will break even.
I think the beta turned a lot of people off from the game. Other AAA shooters just have a level of gameplay polish that makes this look very amateurish.
Commented on 2010-01-26 23:14:00 In reply to SarunasAnyway i agree with Sath on this one, shooting and running just feel so generic, it just feels like everything is on rails but that hasn't stopped me buying the bloody thing :)
Commented on 2010-01-27 08:09:29
Commented on 2010-01-27 08:17:26 In reply to Kostchtchie
Commented on 2010-01-27 09:07:21But the aiming is still skipping frames a bit, it doesnt look like the weapon is moving from the hip to infront of you.
But from what I have seen from the released version interms of animations, its much better.
Commented on 2010-02-01 19:59:05the full game look 10 times better than the beta, and there is NO LAG
too bad some hater here will mis out a good new multiplayer expirience.
Commented on 2010-02-01 20:23:20 In reply to ahlanthe full game look 10 times better than the beta, and there is NO LAG
too bad some hater here will mis out a good new multiplayer expirience.
Commented on 2010-02-02 00:15:22Its very addicting.
One thing that I love about the game is the big open war, reminds me of Frontlines fuel of War, except there is no "war toys" or vehicles to control and less futuristic (which is a shame), other than the transport vehicles.
Anyways, I think its a pretty cool game, but i still think the gunplay is bad compared to MW and Crysis.
The guns damage seems off from faction to faction, atleast the assault rifles.
It feels they didnt put alot of effort into the Raven AR like they did with Valor and SVER.
I tried all factions to the point to try the cool scopes and the AR and Raven lacks that "punch" when shooting while Valor has the best one and then SVER then Raven.
I still went with Raven though considering I love the concept of high-tech sleek look that makes them look like a international "counter terrorist" force.
One thing is that my sister which is around 27 years old was addicted to Warhawk is in love with MAG now, both actually and she hated the beta like I did :)